Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Convergent Evolution

Convergent Evolution

Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Synteny and Evolution

Synteny and Evolution

John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...

Speciation Rates

Speciation Rates

Gene Duplication and Divergence

Gene Duplication and Divergence

The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Migratory jackpot individuals fuel rapid ecotype shifts in Galaxias fishes.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Riverscape heterogeneity shapes population diversity for a migratory fish.

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America·2026

Same author

Consequences of Deforestation on Functional Community Structure Reverse at High Elevations.

The American naturalist·2025

Same author

Nonlinear thinking in ecology and evolution: applying the threshold elemental ratio across levels of ecological organization.

Oecologia·2025

Same author

Temperature-Dependent Shifts in Multiple Indirect Defensive Interactions on Black Cherry.

Ecology and evolution·2025

Same author

Assessing how biofilms modulate stream periphyton metacommunity assemblage: A translocation experiment.

Ecology·2025

Same journal

Traffic Reduction during COVID-19 Lockdowns Benefited Species Already Tolerant of Noise Pollution: An Acoustic Analysis.

The American naturalist·2026

Same journal

On Pachycephalosaurs, Trade-Offs, and the Historical Genesis of Sociosexual Display Structures.

The American naturalist·2026

Same journal

Structured Landscapes Promote Persistence by Favoring Prudent Predators.

The American naturalist·2026

Same journal

Can Carbon Economy Explain Leaf Dynamic Seasonality in a Tropical Seasonal Rainforest?

The American naturalist·2026

Same journal

Behavior and Physiology Outpace Form When Linking Traits to Ecological Responses within Populations: A Meta-Analysis.

The American naturalist·2026

Same journal

Seminal Fluid Proteins as Regulation Factors for Optimizing Reproduction: A Modeling Approach.

The American naturalist·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

Pattern and Process in the Comparative Study of Convergent Evolution.

D Luke Mahler, Marjorie G Weber, Catherine E Wagner

The American Naturalist

|July 22, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Phylogenetic comparative methods help study biodiversity patterns by modeling past evolutionary changes. Integrating these with other approaches offers a robust way to understand evolutionary convergence.

Keywords:

adaptation adaptive radiation convergence evolutionary process phylogenetic comparative methods

More Related Videos

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Published on: May 13, 2016

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses

Published on: September 19, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Microinjection for Transgenesis and Genome Editing in Threespine Sticklebacks

Published on: May 13, 2016

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses

Using a Comparative Species Approach to Investigate the Neurobiology of Paternal Responses

Published on: September 19, 2011

Area of Science:

Evolutionary Biology
Macroevolutionary Studies
Biodiversity Pattern Research

Background:

Understanding broad-scale biodiversity patterns is a core goal in evolutionary biology.
Phylogenetic comparative methods allow analysis of contemporary patterns by modeling past evolutionary processes.
These methods provide tools for studying evolutionary questions previously limited to fossils or lab experiments.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss the inferential nature of convergence in phylogenetic comparative studies.
To highlight limitations and potential biases in comparative approaches to studying convergence.
To advocate for integrated strategies in macroevolutionary research.

Main Methods:

Utilizing phylogenetic comparative methods to model evolutionary change.
Inferring evolutionary convergence through process models when studying extant species.
Analyzing pattern and process in evolutionary studies.

Main Results:

Comparative approaches infer convergence using evolutionary process models, unlike direct measurement.
Assumptions within comparative tools can significantly influence the inference and interpretation of convergent patterns.
Limitations exist in phylogenetic comparative approaches that require careful consideration.

Conclusions:

Investigating evolutionary pattern and process are intertwined in comparative convergence studies.
A multipronged approach integrating comparative methods with ecological, biogeographical, and mechanistic tests is recommended.
Phylogenetic comparative methods, when carefully applied, are powerful for understanding macroevolutionary convergence and its drivers.