Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
Published on: August 4, 2020
Design of Anatomical Population-Based and Patient-Specific Radial Head Implants
Emily A Lalone1, Simon R Deluce2, Hannah Shannon2
1Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Purpose:
The objective of this study was to characterize the morphology of the radial head and design population-based anatomical and patient-specific radial head implants.
Methods:
Computed tomography (CT) images of 50 normal cadaveric upper extremities (34 male, 16 female) were obtained using a 64-slice CT scanner. Surface models were ellipse-fitted and characterized. Using an intersurface distance mapping approach, the surface geometry of the population-based anatomical design (PB-An), 3 distinct patient-specific designs, and an existing axisymmetrical implant (Com-Axi) were compared with the native radial head and the overall surface mismatch was measured.
Results:
Morphological analysis indicated that the diameters of the outer and rim ellipses were correlated. The mean mismatch for the existing commercially available axisymmetrical implants was 0.5 ± 0.1 mm.The PB-An implants showed significantly reduced surface mismatch (0.4 ± 0.2 mm). The PS-An implant using 82 parameters in its design (0.1 ± 0.0 mm), had the lowest mean surface mismatch of any of the implants investigated.
Conclusions:
The mean surface mismatch of radial head implants may be reduced using reverse engineering techniques to determine the required parameters for both population-based and patient-specific implant designs. Whether there is a significant clinical advantage of a more anatomically shaped radial head implant requires additional study. More anatomical implant shapes rely on a surgical technique to accurately position these implants during surgery. It is unclear if this can be achieved clinically using conventional techniques or whether computer-assisted surgery will be required to realize the potential advantages of a more anatomical implant.
Clinical Relevance:
This study characterized the morphology of the radial head with implications for population-based anatomical implants and patient-specific implants. The overall design of each implant was quantitatively compared with the native radial head. This study has implications for the design of patient-specific/anatomical implants and compares their use with commercially available generic implants.
