Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
Published on: September 17, 2019
Explaining general and specific factors in longitudinal, multimethod, and bifactor models: Some caveats and
Tobias Koch1, Jana Holtmann2, Johannes Bohn2
1Methodology Center, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg.
Abstract:
An increasing number of psychological studies are devoted to the analysis of g-factor structures. One key purpose of applying g-factor models is to identify predictors or potential causes of the general and specific effects. Typically, researchers relate predictor variables directly to the general and specific factors using a classical mimic approach. However, this procedure bears some methodological challenges, which often lead to model misspecification and biased parameter estimates. We propose 2 possible modeling strategies to circumvent these problems: the multiconstruct bifactor and the residual approach. We illustrate both modeling approaches for the application of g-factor models to longitudinal and multitrait-multimethod data. Practical guidelines are provided for choosing an appropriate method in empirical applications, and the implications of this investigation for multimethod and longitudinal research are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
Related Concept Videos
Factorial Design
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal Studies
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

