Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

537
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
537
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.4K
False Memories01:18

False Memories

539
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
539
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

439
The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in...
439
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.6K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.6K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the foundations of forensic identification evidence: A critical examination of proficiency test design and results.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Artificial transneurons emulate neuronal activity in different areas of brain cortex.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

The Hawthorne effect in studies of firearm and toolmark examiners.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

A call for open science in forensics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

A scientist's take on scientific evidence in the courtroom.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Science, evidence, law, and justice.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same journal

Tau protein as a regulator of mitochondrial function and dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

A scalable, dividing cell model for the robust propagation and quantification of human sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Epigenetic regulation of mesenchymal BMP signaling directs postnatal organ innervation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Single-shot wide-field biochemical imaging at 1 kHz frame rate.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Morphogenesis and topological evolution of a frustrated nematic liquid crystal under confinement.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

B cell-intrinsic CXCR3 drives efficient generation of ectopic pulmonary germinal center responses to influenza A virus infection.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.6K

Why eyewitnesses fail.

Thomas D Albright1

  • 1The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037 tom@salk.edu.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|July 26, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Eyewitness misidentifications can lead to wrongful convictions. A National Academy of Sciences report, Identifying the Culprit, reviews scientific issues and recommends reforms for eyewitness identification procedures.

Keywords:
criminal justiceforensic sciencelineupmemoryvisual perception

More Related Videos

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

15.2K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.6K
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

15.2K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Legal Science
  • Criminal Justice Research

Background:

  • Eyewitness identifications are crucial in criminal investigations but are prone to errors with severe repercussions.
  • Concerns about eyewitness fallibility prompted a comprehensive study by the National Academy of Sciences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To understand the causes of eyewitness identification errors.
  • To develop recommendations for preventing such errors and improving the use of eyewitness evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Convening a panel of experts to study current practices in eyewitness identification.
  • Analyzing scientific issues related to eyewitness testimony.
  • Reviewing the consensus report 'Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification'.

Main Results:

  • The study identified key scientific issues contributing to eyewitness errors.
  • The report provides specific recommendations for reform in law enforcement and court practices.

Conclusions:

  • Reforms are needed to enhance the reliability of eyewitness identifications.
  • Recommendations focus on improving research, law enforcement best practices, and judicial use of eyewitness evidence.