Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Encapsulation of Cancer Therapeutic Agent Dacarbazine Using Nanostructured Lipid Carrier
Published on: April 26, 2016
Derisking Drug-Induced Carcinogenicity for Novel Therapeutics
Jonathan G Moggs1, Timothy MacLachlan1, Hans-Joerg Martus1
1Preclinical Safety, Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel CH-4057, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Assessing the carcinogenic potential of innovative drugs spanning diverse therapeutic modalities and target biology represents a major challenge during drug development. Novel modalities, such as cell and gene therapies that involve intrinsic genetic modification of the host genome, require distinct approaches for identification of cancer hazard. We emphasize the need for customized weight-of-evidence cancer risk assessments based on mode of action that balance multiple options for preclinical identification of cancer hazard with appropriate labeling of clinical products and risk management plans. We review how advances in molecular carcinogenesis can enhance mechanistic interpretation and preclinical indicators of neoplasia, and recommend that drug targets be systematically assessed for potential association with tumorigenic phenotypes via genetic models and cancer genome resources.
Insights
Assessing cancer risk for novel drugs like cell and gene therapies requires tailored approaches. Customized cancer risk assessments balance preclinical data with clinical product labeling and risk management plans.
Area of Science:
- Drug development
- Molecular carcinogenesis
- Toxicology
Background:
- Assessing carcinogenic potential of innovative drugs is challenging.
- Novel modalities like cell and gene therapies require distinct cancer hazard identification.
- Current methods may not adequately address unique risks of new therapeutic modalities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To emphasize the need for customized weight-of-evidence cancer risk assessments.
- To balance preclinical hazard identification with clinical product labeling and risk management.
- To review advances in molecular carcinogenesis for enhanced interpretation of cancer risk.
Main Methods:
- Review of advances in molecular carcinogenesis.
- Assessment of preclinical indicators of neoplasia.
- Systematic evaluation of drug targets for tumorigenic phenotypes using genetic models and cancer genome resources.
Main Results:
- Novel therapeutic modalities necessitate distinct approaches for cancer hazard identification.
- Advances in molecular carcinogenesis can improve mechanistic interpretation and preclinical indicators.
- Drug targets should be systematically assessed for oncogenic potential.
Conclusions:
- Customized weight-of-evidence cancer risk assessments are crucial for innovative drugs.
- Balancing preclinical data with clinical risk management is essential.
- Integrating molecular carcinogenesis insights and genetic assessments enhances drug safety evaluation.
More Related Videos
04:12Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate DMBA-TPA
Published on: December 19, 2019
09:01Non-invasive Assessment of the Efficacy of New Therapeutics for Intestinal Pathologies Using Serial Endoscopic Imaging of Live Mice
Published on: March 10, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Drug Regulation
Drug Discovery: Overview