Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
Published on: May 29, 2021
Fragment optimization for GPCRs by molecular dynamics free energy calculations: Probing druggable subpockets of the A
Pierre Matricon1, Anirudh Ranganathan2, Eugene Warnick3
1Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, BMC, Box 596, SE-75124, Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract:
Fragment-based lead discovery is becoming an increasingly popular strategy for drug discovery. Fragment screening identifies weakly binding compounds that require optimization to become high-affinity leads. As design of leads from fragments is challenging, reliable computational methods to guide optimization would be invaluable. We evaluated using molecular dynamics simulations and the free energy perturbation method (MD/FEP) in fragment optimization for the A2A adenosine receptor, a pharmaceutically relevant G protein-coupled receptor. Optimization of fragments exploring two binding site subpockets was probed by calculating relative binding affinities for 23 adenine derivatives, resulting in strong agreement with experimental data (R2 = 0.78). The predictive power of MD/FEP was significantly better than that of an empirical scoring function. We also demonstrated the potential of the MD/FEP to assess multiple binding modes and to tailor the thermodynamic profile of ligands during optimization. Finally, MD/FEP was applied prospectively to optimize three nonpurine fragments, and predictions for 12 compounds were evaluated experimentally. The direction of the change in binding affinity was correctly predicted in a majority of the cases, and agreement with experiment could be improved with rigorous parameter derivation. The results suggest that MD/FEP will become a powerful tool in structure-driven optimization of fragments to lead candidates.
More Related Videos
08:49Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Related Concept Videos
GPCR Desensitization
GPCRs Regulate Adenylyl Cylase Activity
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics
Various forces drive these interactions, including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, ionic bonds, electrostatic interactions, and van der Waals forces. These bonds enable drugs to bind to specific sites on proteins,...
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Ligand Binding and Linkage