Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

658
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
658
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

522
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
522
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.5K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.5K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

1.1K
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
1.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

540
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
540

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimating Risk Differences Using Large Healthcare Data Networks for Medical Product Post-Market Safety Outcomes in a Distributed Data Setting and Allowing for Active Post-Market Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Synergistic Composite Solid Electrolyte Based on Multifunctional Polymer Networks for High-Performance Lithium Metal Batteries.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

The Whys, Whens, and Hows of Futility Monitoring.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

A more powerful test for three-arm non-inferiority via risk difference: Frequentist and Bayesian approaches.

Journal of applied statistics·2023
Same author

Surficial grafting of organoimido moieties enhances the capacity performance of oxometallic clusters.

Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)·2022
Same author

Statistical learning in preclinical drug proarrhythmic assessment.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 25, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K

Hierarchical Bayes approach for subgroup analysis.

Yu-Yi Hsu1, Jyoti Zalkikar1, Ram C Tiwari1

  • 1U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|July 28, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a hierarchical Bayes approach for clinical trial subgroup analysis, enhancing treatment effect estimation and consistency assessment. The methods improve understanding of drug efficacy across diverse patient groups.

Keywords:
Bayes factorHierarchical modelconsistencyhalf-Cauchy distributionprior distributions for variance parameters

More Related Videos

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.8K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 25, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

11.7K
Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.8K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical data analysis
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacovigilance

Background:

  • Subgroup analysis is crucial for understanding drug efficacy in diverse patient populations.
  • Linear mixed-effects models offer flexibility for analyzing treatment differences across subgroups.
  • Hierarchical Bayes methods provide posterior distributions for treatment effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss prior selection for variance components in hierarchical Bayes models.
  • To detail estimation and decision-making for overall treatment effects.
  • To assess treatment effect consistency across subgroups using posterior predictive p-values.

Main Methods:

  • Application of hierarchical Bayes to linear mixed-effects models.
  • Prior selection strategies for variance components.
  • Posterior predictive p-values for consistency assessment.
  • Decision procedures using posterior probability or Bayes factor.

Main Results:

  • The study outlines methods for robust estimation of overall and subgroup treatment effects.
  • It provides a framework for assessing the consistency of treatment effects across subgroups.
  • Decision procedures based on posterior probability and Bayes factor are discussed.

Conclusions:

  • The hierarchical Bayes approach offers a flexible and robust framework for clinical subgroup analysis.
  • The proposed methods aid in better understanding drug efficacy and making informed decisions.
  • Assessment of treatment effect consistency is vital for personalized medicine and drug development.