Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tactics of just, equitable, diverse, and inclusive scientific research.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2024
Same author

A comparison of individual and group equivalence-based instruction delivered via Canvas.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2023
Same author

SQAB 2021: Translational research using computation approaches.

Behavioural processes·2022
Same author

Human temporal learning with mixed signals.

Behavioural processes·2021
Same author

Employment outcomes of substance use disorder patients enrolled in a therapeutic workplace intervention for drug abstinence and employment.

Journal of substance abuse treatment·2020
Same author

Financial incentives promote engagement in employment services for unemployed adults in treatment for opioid use disorder.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 25, 2026

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K

Selective attention in pigeon temporal discrimination.

Shrinidhi Subramaniam1,2, Elizabeth G E Kyonka1,3

  • 11 Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|July 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pigeons

Keywords:
Expectancykey peckpeak-interval procedurepigeonselective attentiontiming

More Related Videos

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning
11:20

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

12.5K
Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats
09:31

Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats

Published on: September 15, 2017

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 25, 2026

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K
Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning
11:20

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

12.5K
Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats
09:31

Touchscreen Sustained Attention Task SAT for Rats

Published on: September 15, 2017

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral psychology
  • Animal cognition
  • Operant conditioning

Background:

  • Cues provide varying levels of information about the timing of rewards.
  • Understanding how cue informativeness affects temporal judgments is crucial in behavioral science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between cue informativeness and temporal discrimination in pigeons.
  • To test the hypothesis that temporal discrimination depends on the momentary probability of food availability.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a peak-interval (PI) procedure with fixed-interval (FI) schedules of food.
  • Manipulated cue informativeness (phi correlation) of key light color predicting FI schedule values.
  • Analyzed pigeon peck response distributions and estimated peak times.

Main Results:

  • Pigeons' temporal discrimination was influenced by cue predictiveness (phi).
  • Response distributions became bimodal and converged when cues were less predictive (phi ≤ 0.6).
  • Temporal discrimination accuracy decreased at the less likely interval when cues were highly predictive (phi ≥ 0.6).

Conclusions:

  • Cue informativeness significantly modulates temporal discrimination in pigeons.
  • Pigeons' temporal accuracy is reduced when cues are predictive but lead to less probable outcomes.
  • Attentional processes may explain the observed reduction in temporal discrimination accuracy.