Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Microfluidics in Assessing Platelet Function
Published on: November 8, 2024
Cost-Effectiveness of Long-Term Ticagrelor in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction: Results From the
Elizabeth A Magnuson1, Haiyan Li2, Kaijun Wang2
1Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri; University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Insights
Ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) offers intermediate cost-effectiveness. However, it provides higher value for specific high-risk subgroups, warranting personalized treatment considerations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Ticagrelor plus low-dose aspirin (ASA) reduces cardiovascular events post-myocardial infarction (MI) but increases major bleeding risk.
- The cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor in patients with prior MI within 3 years requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor (60 mg twice daily) plus low-dose aspirin compared to low-dose aspirin alone in patients with a history of MI within the prior 3 years.
Main Methods:
- A prospective economic substudy of the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial involving 21,162 patients.
- Data on medical resource use, survival, and utility were collected over a median of 33 months.
- Lifetime cost-effectiveness was projected from a U.S. healthcare system perspective.
Main Results:
- Total costs were higher for ticagrelor 60 mg ($10,016) versus placebo ($2,333), with similar in-trial quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $94,917 per QALY gained over a lifetime horizon.
- More favorable ICERs were observed in high-risk subgroups, including patients with prior MI, diabetes, renal dysfunction, younger age (<75 years), and peripheral artery disease.
Conclusions:
- Long-term ticagrelor 60 mg plus low-dose aspirin offers intermediate cost-effectiveness for patients with prior MI, based on current guidelines.
- Ticagrelor demonstrates higher value in specific high-risk patient subgroups, suggesting a potential for targeted use.
Background:
In patients with a myocardial infarction (MI) 1 to 3 years earlier, treatment with ticagrelor + low-dose aspirin (ASA) reduces the risk of cardiovascular (CV) death, MI, or stroke compared with low-dose aspirin alone, but at an increased risk of major bleeding.
Objectives:
The authors evaluated cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor + low-dose ASA in patients with prior MI within the prior 3 years.
Methods:
The authors performed a prospective economic substudy alongside the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 54) trial, which randomized 21,162 patients to ASA alone, ticagrelor 60 mg twice daily + low-dose ASA, or ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily + low-dose ASA. Medical resource use data were collected over a median 33-month follow-up. Costs were assessed from the U.S. health care system perspective. In-trial data relating to survival, utility, and costs were combined with lifetime projections to evaluate lifetime cost-effectiveness of the Food and Drug Administration-approved lower-dose ticagrelor regimen (60 mg twice daily).
Results:
Hospitalization costs were similar for ticagrelor 60 mg and placebo ($2,262 vs. $2,333; 95% confidence interval for difference -$303 to $163; p = 0.54); after inclusion of a daily ticagrelor 60 mg cost of $10.52, total costs were higher for ticagrelor ($10,016 vs. $2,333; 95% CI: $7,441 to $7,930; p < 0.001). In-trial quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were similar (2.28 vs. 2.27; p = 0.34). Over a lifetime horizon, ticagrelor was associated with QALY gains of 0.078 and incremental costs of $7,435, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $94,917/QALY gained. Several high-risk groups had more favorable ICERs, including patients with >1 prior MI, multivessel disease, diabetes, renal dysfunction (all with ICERs $50,000 to $70,000/QALY gained), patients age <75 years (ICER = $44,779/QALY gained), and patients with peripheral artery disease (ICER = $13,427/QALY gained).
Conclusions:
For patients with a history of MI >1 year previously, long-term treatment with ticagrelor 60 mg + low-dose ASA yields a cost-effectiveness ratio suggesting intermediate value based on current guidelines. Ticagrelor appears to provide higher value for patients in several recognized high-risk subgroups. (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events [e.g., Death From Heart or Vascular Disease, Heart Attack, or Stroke] in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin [PEGASUS]; NCT01225562).
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care