Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Ferromagnetic Bare Metal Stent for Endothelial Cell Capture and Retention
Published on: September 18, 2015
Should We Still Have Bare-Metal Stents Available in Our Catheterization Laboratory?
Antonio Colombo1, Francesco Giannini1, Carlo Briguori1
1Unit of Cardiovascular Interventions, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Abstract:
The introduction of bare-metal stents (BMS) has represented a major advancement over plain old balloon angioplasty in the management of coronary artery disease. However, the high rates of target lesion revascularization associated with use of BMS have led to the development of drug-eluting stents, which require prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy due to the increased risk of late and very late stent thrombosis. The improvements in newer-generation drug-eluting stents have translated into better safety and efficacy compared with earlier generation and BMS, thus allowing shorter dual antiplatelet therapy duration. Here, we aim to provide reasons as to why we still need BMS in our cardiac catheterization laboratory.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

