Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

4.1K
When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
4.1K
Motor Units01:13

Motor Units

8.9K
The motor unit is a fundamental component of the neuromuscular system and plays a crucial role in coordinating muscle contractions. It consists of a somatic motor neuron, which connects and controls multiple skeletal muscle fibers, forming a single functional segment. The axon of the motor neuron branches out and establishes synaptic connections known as neuromuscular junctions with individual muscle fibers within the motor unit.
Motor units come in different sizes, with smaller units...
8.9K
Motor Units00:46

Motor Units

62.1K
A motor unit consists of two main components: a single efferent motor neuron (i.e., a neuron that carries impulses away from the central nervous system) and all of the muscle fibers it innervates. The motor neuron may innervate multiple muscle fibers, which are single cells, but only one motor neuron innervates a single muscle fiber.
62.1K
Generation of Action Potential in Skeletal Muscles01:24

Generation of Action Potential in Skeletal Muscles

9.5K
Every cell in the body maintains a membrane potential due to an uneven distribution of positive and negative charges across its plasma membrane. The membrane potential is measured in millivolts and quantifies the difference in charge across the membrane.
Like neurons, muscle cells are also regarded as excitable due to their capacity to change in response to stimuli, primarily due to voltage-gated ion channels embedded in their plasma membranes, which get activated by alterations in the...
9.5K
Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

4.8K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
4.8K
Action Potential01:14

Action Potential

11.6K
Neurons communicate by firing action potentials—the electrochemical signal that is propagated along the axon. The signal results in the release of neurotransmitters at axon terminals, thereby transmitting information to the nervous system. An action potential is a specific "all-or-none" change in membrane potential that results in a rapid spike in voltage.
Membrane potential in neurons
Neurons typically have a resting membrane potential of about -70 millivolts (mV). When they receive...
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of normobaric hypoxia and hyperthermia on ventilatory responses to high-intensity interval training bouts.

European journal of applied physiology·2026
Same author

Concurrent control of natural and robotic limbs through a tactile-encoded brain-computer interface.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Reverse engineering of motor unit discharge in multiple sclerosis reveals heterogeneity of voluntary motor commands.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Spiking neural network decoders of finger forces from high-density intramuscular microelectrode arrays.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Differential Effects of High and Low Frequency Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation on Force Steadiness in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: An Exploratory Study.

Neurology and therapy·2026
Same author

A Roadmap to Navigate the Future of Neural Engineering.

Journal of neural engineering·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Functional Isolation of Single Motor Units of Rat Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle
06:54

Functional Isolation of Single Motor Units of Rat Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle

Published on: December 26, 2020

5.9K

Associations between motor unit action potential parameters and surface EMG features.

Alessandro Del Vecchio1,2, Francesco Negro3, Francesco Felici1

  • 1Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.

Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
|July 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Surface electromyography (EMG) offers insights into neural drive. This study clarifies EMG

Keywords:
EMG featuresconduction velocitymotor unitrecruitmentsize principlesurface electromyography

More Related Videos

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
07:53

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Published on: September 13, 2015

22.9K
Simultaneous Intracellular Recording of a Lumbar Motoneuron and the Force Produced by its Motor Unit in the Adult Mouse In vivo
13:07

Simultaneous Intracellular Recording of a Lumbar Motoneuron and the Force Produced by its Motor Unit in the Adult Mouse In vivo

Published on: December 5, 2012

15.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Functional Isolation of Single Motor Units of Rat Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle
06:54

Functional Isolation of Single Motor Units of Rat Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle

Published on: December 26, 2020

5.9K
Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
07:53

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Published on: September 13, 2015

22.9K
Simultaneous Intracellular Recording of a Lumbar Motoneuron and the Force Produced by its Motor Unit in the Adult Mouse In vivo
13:07

Simultaneous Intracellular Recording of a Lumbar Motoneuron and the Force Produced by its Motor Unit in the Adult Mouse In vivo

Published on: December 5, 2012

15.2K

Area of Science:

  • * Neuroscience and Kinesiology: Investigating the relationship between neural control and muscle activity.
  • * Biomedical Engineering: Advancing signal processing techniques for surface electromyography (sEMG).

Background:

  • * The relationship between surface electromyography (sEMG) signals and the neural drive to muscles is complex and debated.
  • * Limited motor unit population data has historically hindered a clear understanding of sEMG's utility in inferring neural control strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To elucidate the potential and limitations of interference sEMG analysis for inferring motor unit recruitment strategies.
  • * To experimentally investigate the association between individual motor unit properties and surface EMG features.
  • * To determine the predictive value of sEMG-derived parameters for motor unit recruitment and muscle activation.

Main Methods:

  • * High-density surface EMG signals were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle during linearly increasing force contractions (up to 70% maximal force).
  • * Individual motor unit properties, including recruitment threshold (RT), conduction velocity (MUCV), median frequency (MDF_MU), and amplitude (RMS_MU), were assessed for 587 motor units across 13 individuals.
  • * Associations between these motor unit properties and features of the interference sEMG signal were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • * Motor unit conduction velocity (MUCV) showed a strong positive association with recruitment threshold (RT) (R² = 0.64).
  • * Median frequency (MDF_MU) and amplitude (RMS_MU) of motor unit action potentials had weaker relationships with RT.
  • * Average conduction velocity estimated from interference sEMG effectively predicted changes in MUCV (R² = 0.71) and correlated strongly with ankle dorsiflexion force (R² = 0.81 ± 0.12).
  • * Average sEMG median frequency and RMS amplitude poorly correlated with motor unit recruitment.

Conclusions:

  • * Interference sEMG spectral and amplitude analyses have significant limitations in accurately inferring neural strategies for muscle control.
  • * Average conduction velocity derived from interference sEMG shows promise as a relevant indicator of motor unit recruitment strategies.
  • * This study provides a comprehensive clarification of the potential and limitations of surface EMG in estimating neural drive to muscles.