Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distribution Reliability and Automation01:25

Distribution Reliability and Automation

542
Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
542
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

283
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
283
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

558
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
558

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Creation of User and Context-Specific Uncertainty Profiles.

Journal of digital imaging·2018
Same author

Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Creating a Standardized and Objective Methodology.

Journal of digital imaging·2017
Same author

Quantitative Analysis of Uncertainty in Medical Reporting: Part 3: Customizable Education, Decision Support, and Automated Alerts.

Journal of digital imaging·2017
Same author

Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation-Part 3: Automated Report Analysis and Data Reconciliation.

Journal of digital imaging·2017
Same author

Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation Part 1: Creation of a Standardized Methodology and Referenceable Database.

Journal of digital imaging·2017
Same author

Redefining the Medical Standard of Care: Event-Specific Workflow Analysis.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2017
Same journal

Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks in Medical Imaging Classification: A Promising Solution for Deep Learning Limits in Data Scarcity Scenarios.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

Detecting and Characterizing Inferior Vena Cava Filters on Abdominal Computed Tomography with Data-Driven Computational Frameworks.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

DMCA-GAN: Dual Multilevel Constrained Attention GAN for MRI-Based Hippocampus Segmentation.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

Left Ventricular Myocardial Dysfunction Evaluation in Thalassemia Patients Using Echocardiographic Radiomic Features and Machine Learning Algorithms.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

Public Imaging Datasets of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Artificial Intelligence: a Review.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
Same journal

External Validation of Robust Radiomic Signature to Predict 2-Year Overall Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Journal of digital imaging·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 25, 2026

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

1.1K

Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation Part 2: Data-Driven Peer Review Selection and

Bruce I Reiner1

  • 1Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, 10 North Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. breiner1@comcast.net.

Journal of Digital Imaging
|July 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomly selected radiology peer reviews may miss errors. A data-driven risk score model can identify high-risk exams and readers for targeted review, improving accuracy and efficiency in radiology quality assurance.

Keywords:
Data miningPeer reviewReport analysisWorkflow distribution

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 25, 2026

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
06:11

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity

Published on: September 26, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Data Science in Medicine

Background:

  • Current radiology peer review practices often involve random selection of a small percentage (e.g., 5%) of exams.
  • This random sampling may lead to significant underestimation of the actual error rates within a radiology practice.
  • Traditional methods lack the precision to identify high-risk cases or readers effectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and describe a data-driven model for quantifying individual radiology exam peer review risk scores.
  • To identify high-risk exams and readers for targeted peer review, enhancing the accuracy of quality assessment.
  • To explore the potential of a data-driven approach to optimize peer review case assignment and introduce blinded review.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a mathematical model to calculate a peer review risk score for each radiology exam.
  • Utilizing this risk score to selectively target high-risk exams and readers for peer review.
  • Exploring analogous models for prioritizing peer review case assignment based on service provider needs and implementing blinded review.

Main Results:

  • A data-driven risk score model offers a more accurate assessment of radiology practice error rates compared to random sampling.
  • Targeted peer review of high-risk exams and readers can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of quality assurance.
  • Blinded peer review has the potential to eliminate bias and better define the standard of care.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing a data-driven risk score model is a preferable alternative to traditional random peer review in radiology.
  • This approach enhances the identification of potential errors and optimizes resource allocation for peer review.
  • Blinded, data-driven peer review can lead to more objective quality assessments and a clearer understanding of the standard of care.