Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: January 22, 2022
[What haemostatic technique should we use for opportunistic salpingectomy during benign laparoscopic hysterectomy?]
G Lamblin1, G Thiberville1, A Bansac Lamblin2
1Département de chirurgie gynécologique, Femme-Mère-Enfant hospital, 69000 Lyon-Bron, France.
Objective:
To compare ovarian function before and after laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy for benign lesions with two different systems of haemostasis.
Methods:
In this prospective randomized study comparing two types of energy used for coagulation in bilateral salpingectomy (group A: bipolar electric energy, versus group B: ultrasonic advanced energy [Harmonic®]), forty consecutive non-menopausal patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign lesions were included. Values of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), LH and FSH, antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian vascularization on bilateral Doppler ultrasound, quality of life (questionnaire) were assessed preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.
Results:
Preliminary analysis showed shorter salpingectomy operating time (P<0.0001) and less bleeding (P<0.005) in group B. In group A, there was no statistical difference except a decrease in AFC at 1 and 3 months on the right ovary (P=0.04). In group B, AMH levels were significantly lower postoperatively at 3 months and LH levels were increased at 3 months (respectively P=0.02 et P=0.04). There was no statistical difference in the ultrasonographic data. Quality of life did not significantly differ in both groups.
Conclusion:
Preliminary findings showed reduced AMH levels at 3months postoperatively in ultrasonic energy group whereas there was no significative menopausal symptoms. It seems important to continue this study in order to know the real effects of both energy systems on the ovarian function.

