Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Role of Routine Follow-up Coronary Angiography After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Systematic Review and
Naoki Misumida1, Akihiro Kobayashi2, Sun Moon Kim1
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky.
Insights
Routine follow-up coronary angiography after percutaneous coronary intervention may reduce myocardial infarction but increases revascularization. Further research is needed to determine its clinical utility for patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Previous studies suggest routine coronary angiography (CAG) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increases revascularization without clear benefit in major adverse clinical events.
- Prior research lacked adequate power to assess hard clinical endpoints like myocardial infarction (MI) or death, leaving clinical utility uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized trials comparing outcomes after PCI with and without routine follow-up CAG.
- To determine the clinical utility of routine follow-up CAG in managing patients post-PCI.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of five randomized trials.
- Included 4,584 patients comparing routine CAG versus clinical follow-up post-PCI.
- Analyzed data on myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and target lesion revascularization.
Main Results:
- Routine follow-up CAG was associated with a lower rate of MI (OR 0.65; P=0.01).
- No significant reduction in all-cause mortality was observed (OR 0.87; P=0.48).
- A higher rate of target lesion revascularization was noted (OR 1.73; P<0.001).
Conclusions:
- Routine follow-up CAG after PCI increases revascularization rates.
- Routine follow-up CAG is associated with a reduced rate of subsequent MI.
- Further investigation into the role of routine follow-up angiography is warranted.
Background:
Prior studies have shown that routine follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increases the incidence of revascularization without a clear reduction in major adverse clinical events. However, none of these prior studies were adequately powered to evaluate hard clinical endpoints such as myocardial infarction (MI) or death and thus the clinical utility of such practice remains to be determined.
Methods And Results:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared clinical outcomes after PCI between patients who underwent routine follow-up CAG and those who only had clinical follow-up. Five randomized trials, totaling 4,584 patients met our inclusion criteria, including studies that used sub-randomization and ones that assigned consecutive patients per study protocol. Our results showed that routine follow-up CAG was associated with a lower rate of MI (odds ratio [OR] 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.91; P=0.01) without reduction in all-cause mortality (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.59-1.28; P=0.48), and a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.42-2.11; P<0.001).
Conclusions:
Our meta-analysis demonstrated that routine follow-up CAG after PCI was associated with a higher rate of revascularization, but also with a reduction in the rate of subsequent MI. Further studies investigating the potential role of routine follow-up angiography may be warranted.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

