Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Determinants of Implementation of Isolation Precautions Against Infections by Multidrug-Resistant Microorganisms: A
Thomas Bénet1, Raphaele Girard1, Solweig Gerbier-Colomban1
11Service d'Hygiène,Epidémiologie,Infectiovigilance et Prévention,Hospices Civils de Lyon,Lyon,France.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES We aimed to ascertain the factors associated with lack of isolation precautions (IP) in patients infected or colonized by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCR-E) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospital settings. DESIGN Prospective surveillance and audit of practices. SETTING The study included 4 university hospitals in Lyon, France. PARTICIPANTS All patients hospitalized between April and June in 2013 and 2015 were included. Case patients had ≥1 clinical sample positive for MRSA and/or 3GCR-E. METHODS Factors associated with the lack of IP implementation were identified using multivariate logistic regression. The incidence of MDRO infections was expressed per 10,000 patient days. RESULTS Overall, 57,222 patients accounting for 192,234 patient days of hospitalization were included, and 635 (1.1%) MDRO cases were identified. MRSA incidence was 2.5 per 10,000 patient days (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.1-3.0) and 3GCR-E incidence was 10.1 per 10,000 patient days (95% CI, 9.2-11.0), with no crude difference between 2013 and 2015 (P=.15 and P=.11, respectively). Among 3GCR-E, the main species were Escherichia coli (43.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.0%). Isolation precautions were implemented in 78.5% of cases. Lack of IP implementation was independently associated with patient age, year, specialty, hospital, colonization compared with infection, and lack of medical prescription for IPs (adjusted odds ratio, 17.4; 95% CI, 8.5-35.8; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS MRSA and 3GCR-E infections and/or colonizations are frequent in healthcare settings, and IPs are implemented in most cases. When IPs are lacking, the main factor is the absence of medical prescription for IPs, underscoring the need for alerts to physicians by the microbiological laboratory and/or the infection control team. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1188-1195.
Insights
Lack of isolation precautions for patients with MRSA or 3GCR-E is often due to no medical order. This highlights the need for better communication between labs, infection control teams, and physicians.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Epidemiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCR-E) are significant healthcare-associated pathogens.
- Effective isolation precautions (IP) are crucial for controlling the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in hospital settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors associated with the failure to implement isolation precautions in hospitalized patients with MRSA or 3GCR-E.
- To determine the incidence of MRSA and 3GCR-E infections and/or colonizations in university hospitals.
Main Methods:
- A prospective surveillance and audit of practices was conducted across four university hospitals in Lyon, France.
- Data from 57,222 patients hospitalized between April and June 2013 and 2015 were analyzed.
- Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the lack of IP implementation.
Main Results:
- The incidence of MRSA was 2.5 and 3GCR-E was 10.1 per 10,000 patient days.
- Isolation precautions were implemented in 78.5% of identified cases.
- Lack of IP was independently associated with patient age, year, specialty, hospital, colonization status, and critically, the absence of a medical prescription for IPs (aOR=17.4, P<.001).
Conclusions:
- MRSA and 3GCR-E are prevalent in healthcare settings, with IPs being implemented in the majority of cases.
- The primary reason for the lack of IP implementation is the absence of a medical prescription.
- Enhanced communication and alert systems involving microbiological laboratories and infection control teams are essential to improve IP adherence.
More Related Videos
09:02A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
Published on: June 7, 2017
08:58Isolation and Identification of Waterborne Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Molecular Characterization of their Antibiotic Resistance Genes
Published on: March 3, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness