Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Comparative evaluation of bite force analytical study following mandibular osteosysthesis using three-dimensional and
Pallav Kumar Kinra1, K Jayakumar1, C S Soumithran1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Aims And Objectives:
The aim is to study the effectiveness of 2 mm three-dimensional (3D) titanium miniplates and 2 mm conventional titanium miniplates in osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures by comparing the change in bite force.
Methodology:
The study comprised forty patients of age group 20-40 years, weighing 55-75 kg having mandibular fractures. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups In Group A, twenty patients underwent osteosynthesis using 3D titanium miniplates (2.0 mm system), whereas in Group B, twenty patients underwent osteosynthesis using conventional titanium miniplates (2.0 mm system). After fixation of fracture segments with miniplates, the patients were assessed on the basis of evaluation of bite force at incisor, right molar and left molar region after 1, 3, 6 , and 8 weeks. Comparison of change in bite force was done between Group A and Group B at different follow-ups at incisor, right molar, and left molar.
Results:
Bite force recordings showed increasing values at subsequent follow-ups, corresponding to the healing of the fracture in both groups. At follow-up III (6 weeks) and IV (8 weeks), bite force values reached near to those in healthy individuals. A significant difference was observed in change in bite force of Group A and Group B at incisor left molar and right molar on subsequent followups. 3D titanium miniplate requires less surgical exposure of the underlying fracture site, with a minimal traction of the surrounding soft tissue.
Interpretation And Conclusion:
3D miniplates in mandibular fractures are efficacious enough to bear masticatory loads during the osteosynthesis of fractures. It gives the advantage of greater stability, increased bite force, reduced implant material, and 3D stability.
