Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why do research on research?

J Anderson, D C Evered

    Lancet (London, England)
    |October 4, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Research evaluation is crucial for minimizing wasted resources, despite some viewing it negatively. Implementing analytical techniques and strategic planning can improve research efficiency and secure future public support.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    "Deadly experiments". UK's programme was open and ethical.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1995
    Same author

    Meta-analysis for descriptive research.

    Research in nursing & health·1992
    Same author

    Oxygen-induced lung damage. Relationship to lung mitochondrial glutathione levels.

    The American review of respiratory disease·1992
    Same author

    Comparison of psychosocial adaptation and sexual function of survivors of advanced Hodgkin disease treated by MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP alternating with ABVD.

    Cancer·1992
    Same author

    Effects of verapamil on the acute toxicity of doxorubicin in vivo.

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute·1992
    Same author

    Hypothesis for the control of clotting factor VIII inhibitory antibodies by decreasing potency of helper T-cell-recognized epitopes in factor VIII.

    Scandinavian journal of immunology·1992
    Same journal

    Medical compartmentalisation: a patient with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in Japan.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-edotreotide versus everolimus for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (COMPETE): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    Research priorities for characterising Bundibugyo virus.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    Rethinking treatment sequence in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    Dual mobility total hip replacement in fractures: stability promotes patient confidence.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    Dual mobility versus standard cups in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures (Duality): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Research
    • Research Management
    • Science Policy

    Background:

    • Research evaluation is often perceived negatively, but this view is mistaken.
    • A significant portion of research funding is inevitably wasted due to the unpredictable nature of discovery.
    • There is a need to address inefficiencies in research processes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To advocate for the positive case of investing in research evaluation.
    • To highlight the potential of research evaluation in minimizing resource wastage.
    • To emphasize the importance of a proactive approach to research assessment and planning.

    Main Methods:

    • Application of analytical techniques to examine research training, funding, and output assessment.
    • Development of strategic forecasting and planning mechanisms.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Radical review of biomedical research activities.

    • Main Results:

    • Research evaluation can help identify and minimize resource wastage.
    • Improved training, funding, and assessment methods can enhance research systems.
    • Strategic planning is essential for effective research endeavors.

    Conclusions:

    • Research evaluation is a positive and necessary activity for optimizing resource allocation.
    • The research community must proactively evaluate its performance and engage in planning.
    • Failure to self-evaluate may lead to external assessments by uninformed parties, jeopardizing public support.