Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Transulnar cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: techniques, transradial comparisons,
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, Texas, 79905.
Abstract:
Ulnar arterial access for cardiac catheterization and intervention is an alternative approach compared with radial or femoral access. Ulnar access is infrequently performed since the radial artery is readily palpable and is commonly used worldwide to minimize vascular complications from femoral access. Nevertheless, ulnar access provides a suitable access site in patients who are poor candidates for femoral access, have pre-existing radial occlusion, radial artery hypoplasia or hyperplasia from prior radial artery procedures, radial stenosis, radial loops, radial tortuosity, small radial arteries, and/or have future need for radial graft for dialysis or coronary artery bypass graft. Furthermore, femoral access is the standard default option if radial access fails. Consequently, learning ulnar access provides a suitable forearm alternative to avoid femoral access when deemed high risk or undesirable. This review discusses the techniques of ulnar access, advantages and disadvantages of ulnar versus radial access, the clinical trials on ulnar cardiac catheterization and its associated complications.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management

