Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Munchausen by Proxy: A Qualitative Investigation into Online Perceptions of Medical Child Abuse
Anoushka P A Anderson1, Marc D Feldman2, Joanne Bryce1
1School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Abstract:
In Munchausen by proxy (MBP) maltreatment, increasingly termed "medical child abuse" (MCA), a caregiver fabricates or induces illness in another. The perpetrator's goal for the behavior is to meet personal emotional needs by forcing unnecessary or misguided medical or psychological treatment. Generally, a mother is the perpetrator and her child is the victim. There is a serious lack of research into most aspects of MCA, and this study is the first to utilize the anonymity of an Internet forum to investigate victims' first-hand experiences of, and the public's opinions about, suspected and confirmed MCA. Three-hundred and fifty-six posts by 348 members were explored and coded using formal qualitative content analysis. By accessing an open-thought online forum, this paper acquired information regarding social perceptions about the nonperpetrating partners who are unaware of the maltreatment; the disturbing and counterintuitive phenomenon of MCA itself; and the resistance often faced by those who attempt to report it.
Insights
This study explores medical child abuse (MCA), where a caregiver fabricates illness in a child. It uses online forums to understand victim experiences and public perceptions of this abuse.
Area of Science:
- Child Abuse Research
- Psychology
- Sociology
Background:
- Medical child abuse (MCA), formerly Munchausen by proxy (MBP), involves caregivers fabricating or inducing illness in a child.
- Perpetrators seek emotional fulfillment by subjecting children to unnecessary medical interventions.
- Research on MCA is limited, particularly regarding victim experiences and public awareness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate first-hand experiences of MCA victims.
- To explore public perceptions of suspected and confirmed MCA.
- To examine the role of non-offending partners and reporting challenges.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative content analysis of 356 posts from 348 members on an online forum.
- Utilizing the anonymity of an internet forum to gather candid information.
- Exploration of social perceptions, the phenomenon of MCA, and reporting resistance.
Main Results:
- Gained insights into social perceptions of unaware partners in MCA cases.
- Documented the counterintuitive nature of MCA.
- Identified resistance encountered when reporting suspected MCA.
- Provided a platform for victims and the public to share experiences anonymously.
Conclusions:
- Online forums offer a unique avenue for researching sensitive topics like MCA.
- Understanding public and victim perspectives is crucial for addressing MCA.
- Further research is needed to support victims and improve reporting mechanisms for MCA.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Obedience
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Dissociative Identity Disorder

