Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Hemocompatibility Testing of Blood-Contacting Implants in a Flow Loop Model Mimicking Human Blood Flow
Published on: March 5, 2020
In vivo and in vitro performance of a China-made hemodialysis machine: a multi-center prospective controlled study
Yong Wang1, Xiang-Mei Chen2, Guang-Yan Cai1
1Department of Nephrology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Chinese PLA Institute of Nephrology, State Key Laboratory of Nephrology, National Clinical Research Center for Chronic Kidney Diseases, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Objective:
To evaluate the in vivo and in vitro performance of a China-made dialysis machine (SWS-4000).
Methods:
This was a multi-center prospective controlled study consisting of both long-term in vitro evaluations and cross-over in vivo tests in 132 patients. The China-made SWS-4000 dialysis machine was compared with a German-made dialysis machine (Fresenius 4008) with regard to Kt/V values, URR values, and dialysis-related adverse reactions in patients on maintenance hemodialysis, as well as the ultrafiltration rate, the concentration of electrolytes in the proportioned dialysate, the rate of heparin injection, the flow rate of the blood pump, and the rate of malfunction.
Results:
The Kt/V and URR values at the 1st and 4th weeks of dialysis as well as the incidence of adverse effects did not differ between the two groups in cross-over in vivo tests (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the error values of the ultrafiltration rate, the rate of heparin injection or the concentrations of electrolytes in the proportioned dialysate at different time points under different parameter settings. At weeks 2 and 24, with the flow rate of the blood pump set at 300 mL/min, the actual error of the SWS-4000 dialysis machine was significantly higher than that of the Fresenius 4008 dialysis machine (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference at other time points or under other settings (P > 0.05). The malfunction rate was higher in the SWS-4000 group than in the Fresenius 4008 group (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
The in vivo performance of the SWS-4000 dialysis machine is roughly comparable to that of the Fresenius 4008 dialysis machine; however, the malfunction rate of the former is higher than that of the latter in in vitro tests. The stability and long-term accuracy of the SWS-4000 dialysis machine remain to be improved.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
