Mouse macrophages show different requirements for phosphatidylserine receptor Tim4 in efferocytosis

Yuichi Yanagihashi1, Katsumori Segawa1, Ryota Maeda2

  • 1Laboratory of Biochemistry and Immunology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

Insights

Protein S (ProS) and growth arrest-specific 6 (Gas6) facilitate efferocytosis by binding phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) and TAM receptors. Tim4 enhances this process in specific macrophages, revealing a collaborative mechanism for efficient efferocytosis.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Cell Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Protein S (ProS) and growth arrest-specific 6 (Gas6) are ligands that bind phosphatidylserine (PtdSer).
  • These ligands engage TAM-family receptors (Tyro3, Axl, Mer) to promote efferocytosis, the process of clearing apoptotic cells.
  • Understanding the specific interactions and cellular requirements for TAM-mediated efferocytosis is crucial for immune regulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the binding properties of mouse ProS and Gas6 to PtdSer and TAM receptors.
  • To investigate the role of TAM receptors and Tim4 in mediating efferocytosis across different macrophage populations.
  • To elucidate the collaborative mechanisms between TAM receptors and Tim4 in efferocytosis.

Main Methods:

  • Production of recombinant mouse ProS, Gas6, and TAM receptor extracellular domains fused to an IgG Fc region using HEK293T cells.
  • Binding assays to determine the affinity of ProS and Gas6 for PtdSer, Mer, Tyro3, and Axl.
  • Functional assays using NIH 3T3 cell lines expressing single TAM receptors to assess efferocytosis.
  • Analysis of efferocytosis in various primary macrophage populations (resident peritoneal, Kupffer, CD169+ skin, thioglycollate-elicited peritoneal, and microglia) in the presence or absence of Tim4.

Main Results:

  • ProS and Gas6 bound PtdSer, Mer, and Tyro3 in a Ca2+-dependent manner with nanomolar affinity.
  • Gas6 exhibited strong binding to Axl, while ProS did not bind Axl.
  • TAM receptor-mediated efferocytosis efficiency correlated with the receptor-binding capabilities of ProS and Gas6.
  • Tim4 enhanced TAM-dependent efferocytosis, with its requirement varying across different macrophage types; resident peritoneal macrophages, Kupffer cells, and CD169+ skin macrophages required Tim4, whereas thioglycollate-elicited peritoneal macrophages and microglia did not.

Conclusions:

  • ProS and Gas6 display distinct binding profiles to TAM receptors, influencing their efferocytosis-inducing capacity.
  • Tim4 acts as a crucial co-factor for TAM-mediated efferocytosis in specific macrophage populations, particularly those residing in tissues.
  • These findings highlight a collaborative pathway involving TAM receptors and Tim4 for efficient efferocytosis, with cell-type specific regulation, impacting immune homeostasis and clearance processes.

Related Concept Videos