Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Ilan Goldenberg1, Arthur J Moss
1Heart Research Follow-up Program, Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Box 653, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642-8653, USA.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) save lives in high-risk patients with ischemic heart disease. However, their effectiveness may be limited in certain situations, such as shortly after heart procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Ischemic left ventricular dysfunction significantly elevates the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.
- Pharmacologic antiarrhythmic drug therapy shows limited efficacy in preventing mortality in this high-risk group.
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have demonstrated substantial life-saving benefits in both primary and secondary prevention trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the established benefits of ICDs for high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.
- To examine the limitations of ICD therapy in specific patient subsets within coronary artery disease populations.
- To synthesize current knowledge from clinical trials on ICD efficacy and constraints.
Main Methods:
- Review of randomized clinical trials focusing on primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
- Analysis of secondary data from these trials to identify specific patient populations and circumstances.
- Evaluation of evidence regarding defibrillator efficacy in relation to coronary artery disease management.
Main Results:
- ICDs provide significant life-saving benefits for patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death.
- Secondary analyses reveal limitations in ICD efficacy, particularly early after coronary revascularization.
- Reduced defibrillator effectiveness is noted in patients following acute myocardial infarction.
Conclusions:
- ICDs are a crucial intervention for preventing arrhythmic mortality in high-risk ischemic heart disease patients.
- Careful consideration of the timing of ICD implantation relative to revascularization and myocardial infarction is warranted.
- Further research may be needed to optimize ICD use in specific coronary artery disease subsets.
Abstract:
Patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction are at a high risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that pharmacologic management with antiarrhythmic drugs has limited efficacy for the prevention of arrhythmic mortality in this high-risk population, whereas the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has significant life-saving benefit in primary and secondary prevention trials. However, secondary analyses of these studies have identified some limitations of the ICD in subsets of patients with coronary artery disease, including limited defibrillator efficacy early after coronary revascularization and acute myocardial infarction. We review current knowledge from primary and secondary prevention clinical trials regarding the benefit and limitations of the ICD in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

