[Neurochemical aspects of interneuronal communication]

It is suggested that the term neurotransmission, which is used to designate neuronal communication at synaptic level, be associated to the less restrictive term neuromodulation. These two types of intercellular communication seem in fact to be two basically different mechanisms, both of which contribute to neuronal integration. The integration of neuronal information at cellular level appears to be more complex than the simple addition of excitatory plus inhibitory influences eliciting postsynaptic responses. Evidence has been obtained that non synaptic transmission can alter the capacity of a given synapse to transfer neuronal information from the presynaptic element to the postsynaptic neuron. For instance, presynaptic mechanisms provide evidence for the functional independence of the nerve terminals, since the release of neuromediators by the latter is sometimes independent of the axonal firing rate. Similarly, the somato-dendritic part of some neurons exhibits intrinsic functions, such as a dendritic release of neuromediator, suggesting that the control of the axonal firing rate takes place partly at this somato-dendritic level and does not depend for the totality on afferent axonic information. The intercellular operations which organize individual neurons into neuronal networks will also occur either at somato-dendritic level or at the level of specific nerve terminals selected as the result of presynaptic interactions. This integration of neuronal information also seems to take place at postsynaptic level, where cooperative interactions have been shown to occur between various receptors. These mechanisms will function at the level of a single nerve terminal containing more than one neuromediator. Neuromodulation can therefore be said to involve very efficient adaptive processes, which help to account for the fact that such large behavioral responses are expressed by such a small number of neuronal elements.