Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Post-Retained Single Crowns versus Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 7-Year Prospective Clinical Study
M Ferrari1,2, R Sorrentino1,3, J Juloski1,4
11 Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Abstract:
Biomechanical integrity of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) is often compromised. Degree of hard tissue loss and type of final prosthetic restoration should be carefully considered when making a treatment plan. The objective of this prospective clinical trial was to assess the influence of the type of prosthetic restoration as well as the degree of hard tissue loss on 7-y clinical performance of ETT restored with fiber posts. Two groups ( n = 60) were defined depending on the type of prosthetic restoration needed: 1) single unit porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns (SCs) and 2) 3- to 4-unit PFM fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), with 1 healthy and 1 endodontically treated and fiber post-restored abutment. Within each group, samples were divided into 2 subgroups ( n = 30) according to the amount of residual coronal tissues after abutment buildup and final preparation: A) >50% of coronal residual structure or B) equal to or <50% of coronal residual structure. The clinical outcome was assessed based on clinical and intraoral radiographic examinations at the recalls after 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 84 mo. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and Cox regression analysis ( P < 0.05). The overall 7-y survival rate of ETT restored with fiber post and either SCs or FDPs was 69.2%. The highest 84-mo survival rate was recorded in group 1A (90%), whereas teeth in group 2B exhibited the lowest performance (56.7% survival rate). The log-rank test detected statistically significant differences in survival rates among the groups ( P = 0.048). Cox regression analysis revealed that the amount of residual coronal structure ( P = 0.041; hazard ratio [HR], 2.026; 95% confidence interval [CI] for HR, 1.031-3.982) and the interaction between the type of prosthetic restoration and the amount of residual coronal structure ( P = 0.024; HR, 1.372; 95% CI for HR, 1.042-1.806) were statistically significant factors for survival ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01532947).
