Re-Examination of the BEST Trial Using Composite Outcomes, Including Emergency Department Visits

Li Shen1, Pardeep S Jhund1, Ulrik M Mogensen2

  • 1BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

JACC. Heart Failure
|August 5, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Choosing the right endpoint in heart failure trials significantly impacts study size and duration. Broader composite endpoints, like cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, reduce trial requirements compared to mortality alone.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Endpoint selection in heart failure trials has evolved over three decades.
  • The Beta-blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST) provides a case study for endpoint analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the influence of endpoint choice on trial size, duration, and interpretation of results in heart failure patients.
  • To compare different composite endpoints and recurrent event analysis within the BEST trial.

Main Methods:

  • Cox regression analysis was used to compare bucindolol's effect on mortality, cardiovascular death/heart failure hospitalization (CVD/HFH), and expanded composites including ED visits.
  • The Lin, Wei, Ying, and Yang model was employed for recurrent event analysis.

Main Results:

  • The composite endpoint of CVD/HFH showed a significant benefit for bucindolol (HR: 0.80; p < 0.001) compared to placebo.
  • Using CVD/HFH as the endpoint instead of all-cause mortality would have reduced trial size by 40% and duration by 69%.
  • Recurrent CVD/HFH events also favored bucindolol (rate ratio: 0.83; p = 0.003).

Conclusions:

  • Endpoint selection critically influences heart failure trial logistics and outcome interpretation.
  • Broader composite endpoints and the analysis of recurrent events warrant further investigation in clinical trials.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
500
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
658
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.9K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.7K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.2K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
656