Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
12.3K
Perceived Shared Condemnation Intensifies Punitive Moral Emotions
Naoki Konishi1, Tomoko Oe2, Hiroshi Shimizu3
1Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Scientific Reports
|August 6, 2017
Summary
Understanding punishment in human cooperation is key. This study shows that knowing others condemn norm violations amplifies moral outrage, aiding costly punishment and cooperation.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary psychology
- Social psychology
- Behavioral economics
Background:
- Human cooperation relies on costly punishment, but its evolutionary stability is debated.
- Punishers face a free-rider problem from non-punishers.
- Moral emotions like outrage and disgust may drive costly punishment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if perceived social condemnation influences moral emotions and empathy.
- To understand how shared condemnation affects the willingness to punish.
Main Methods:
- Study 1: Scenario-based correlational study.
- Study 2: Experimental manipulation of shared condemnation information.
- Study 3: Autobiographical recall to assess external validity.
Main Results:
- Perceived social condemnation positively correlated with moral outrage and disgust.
- Shared condemnation reduced empathy for norm violators.
- Experimental evidence confirmed that shared condemnation amplifies moral outrage.
Conclusions:
- Socially shared condemnation enhances moral emotions, potentially facilitating costly punishment.
- This mechanism may help resolve the evolutionary puzzle of costly punishment in human cooperation.
- Knowledge of others' condemnation can overcome free-riding incentives.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
24.9K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
24.9K
Group Polarization
39.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.2K
Factors Affecting Perception
2.9K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
2.9K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
7.5K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.5K
Motivational Bias
424
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
424
Stereotype Content Model
15.5K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.5K

