Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Multifocal Electroretinograms
Published on: December 4, 2011
Ganglion cell layer segmentation and the two-flash multifocal electroretinogram improve structure function analysis
Livia M Brandao1,2, Anna A Ledolter3, Matthias Monhart4
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Livia.Brandao@usb.ch.
Including macular ganglion cell layer thickness and two-global flash multifocal electroretinogram (2F-mfERG) enhances glaucoma structure-function analysis, offering complementary insights beyond standard automated perimetry (SAP).
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neuroscience
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) diagnosis and monitoring rely on structure-function analysis.
- Current methods may not fully capture early glaucomatous changes, particularly in the macula.
- Integrating advanced electrophysiological and imaging techniques can improve diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance structure-function analysis in POAG by incorporating the two-global flash multifocal electroretinogram (2F-mfERG).
- To evaluate the utility of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) segmentation in glaucoma assessment.
- To compare the diagnostic capabilities of 2F-mfERG and GCIPL thickness with standard automated perimetry (SAP).
Main Methods:
- Twenty-five glaucoma patients (pre-perimetric and POAG) and 16 controls underwent 2F-mfERG, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and SAP.
- Calculated root mean square for 2F-mfERG responses (DC, IC1, IC2) and analyzed macular total thickness (mT) and GCIPL thickness via OCT.
- Compared central 10° and 15° 2F-mfERG values with corresponding OCT and visual field data.
Main Results:
- Both pre-perimetric glaucoma (PPG) and POAG groups showed significantly reduced mfERG responses compared to controls.
- A subset of glaucoma patients exhibited reduced central mfERG and GCIPL thickness without SAP defects.
- MfERG responses (DC, IC2) and GCIPL thickness correlated positively with macular thickness (mT); GCIPL thickness correlated with IC2.
- DC, IC2, and GCIPL thickness demonstrated high accuracy in differentiating glaucoma from controls (AUC > 0.89).
Conclusions:
- Including GCIPL thickness and 2F-mfERG significantly improves structure-function analysis in glaucoma.
- These measures provide complementary information to standard automated perimetry (SAP).
- The combined approach offers a more comprehensive assessment of glaucomatous damage.
More Related Videos
12:48In Vivo Dynamics of Retinal Microglial Activation During Neurodegeneration: Confocal Ophthalmoscopic Imaging and Cell Morphometry in Mouse Glaucoma
Published on: May 11, 2015
07:11Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020