Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

5.8K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"Alkaline-Hammer Strategy" Breaks Acidic and Stromal Barriers to Induce Alkaliptosis and Enhance Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same author

Cardiac regeneration and repair: the emerging mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.

Molecular biomedicine·2026
Same author

Medical image local augmentation via text- and mask-guided diffusion model.

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Hypoxia-induced upregulation of lncRNA SLC9A3-AS1 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression through the miR-506-5p/ASPH/NOTCH1 pathway.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

CDK10 loss primes tumor cells for transcriptional vulnerability and sensitizes to CDK12/13 inhibition.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

Structural basis of Fumosorinone-mediated allosteric inhibition of PTP1B for cancer immunotherapy.

Communications biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells
09:05

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells

Published on: September 4, 2019

23.4K

Optimised metrics for CRISPR-KO screens with second-generation gRNA libraries.

Swee Hoe Ong1, Yilong Li1, Hiroko Koike-Yusa1

  • 1Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.

Scientific Reports
|August 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Genome-wide CRISPR knockout (CRISPR-KO) screening performance was evaluated using second-generation libraries. Optimal parameters were identified, revealing 10-20% false negative rates in CRISPR-KO screens.

More Related Videos

Performing an In Vitro Genome-Wide CRISPR Knockout Screen in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells
07:37

Performing an In Vitro Genome-Wide CRISPR Knockout Screen in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells

Published on: January 31, 2025

1.5K
MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data
07:17

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data

Published on: February 7, 2025

946

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells
09:05

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells

Published on: September 4, 2019

23.4K
Performing an In Vitro Genome-Wide CRISPR Knockout Screen in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells
07:37

Performing an In Vitro Genome-Wide CRISPR Knockout Screen in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells

Published on: January 31, 2025

1.5K
MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data
07:17

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data

Published on: February 7, 2025

946

Area of Science:

  • * Functional Genomics
  • * Genetic Screening
  • * CRISPR Technology

Background:

  • * Genome-wide CRISPR-based knockout (CRISPR-KO) screening is a powerful tool for systematic genetic analysis of cellular phenotypes.
  • * Advancements in guide RNA (gRNA) design and prediction algorithms aim to enhance screening performance.
  • * Second-generation CRISPR-KO libraries incorporate these improvements for increased efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To compare the performance of three distinct second-generation human genome-wide CRISPR-KO libraries.
  • * To investigate the impact of gRNA scaffold, gRNAs per gene, and replicate number on screening outcomes.
  • * To estimate the false negative rates of current CRISPR-KO screening methodologies.

Main Methods:

  • * Comparative analysis of three second-generation human genome-wide CRISPR-KO libraries.
  • * Evaluation of screening performance based on gRNA scaffold, number of gRNAs per gene, and replicate count.
  • * Statistical estimation of false negative rates in CRISPR-KO screens.

Main Results:

  • * A library design with 6 gRNAs per gene and duplicated screens offered the best performance trade-off.
  • * Despite improvements, all tested libraries exhibited library-specific false negatives.
  • * The study provides the first estimation of false negative rates for CRISPR-KO screens, ranging from 10% to 20%.

Conclusions:

  • * Optimized screening parameters, including library design and replication strategy, are crucial for robust CRISPR-KO screens.
  • * Understanding and quantifying false negative rates is essential for accurate interpretation of screening results.
  • * The findings will aid in designing more effective CRISPR-KO screens and constructing custom gRNA libraries.