Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
The disastrous boomerang effects of "citation mania"
1International CCN Society, Nice, France. annickperbal@yahoo.com.
Insights
The current citation system is evolving, leading to increased scientific paper retractions. Inconsistent citation metrics create bias, endangering scientific communication and trust in research databases.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical research
- Scientific communication
- Bibliometrics
Background:
- Commentary by Dadkhah et al. highlighted issues with citing questionable papers.
- Retraction of CCN1 protein studies by Lin et al. raised concerns.
- Existing citation systems may be contributing to scientific misconduct.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the evolution of scientific citation systems.
- To investigate the link between citation metrics and publication retractions.
- To assess the impact on scientific communication.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of recent publications and retractions.
- Review of citation practices and metrics.
- Bibliometric analysis of scientific literature.
Main Results:
- Increasing publication retractions observed over several years.
- Inconsistent citation metrics identified as a significant bias.
- Citation system evolution poses a threat to scientific integrity.
Conclusions:
- The current citation system requires re-evaluation.
- Addressing bias in citation metrics is crucial for reliable scientific communication.
- Mitigating the impact of questionable research practices is essential.
Abstract:
The recent publication of a commentary article by Dadkhah et al. (J Cell Commun Signal 11:181-185, 2017) which addressed issues raised by the citation of questionable scientific papers in current databases and the recent retraction of manuscripts dealing with the biological properties of the CCN1 protein by Lin et al. (J Biol Chem 291(53):27433, 2016) prompted us to examine how this situation reflects an evolution of the original citation system, endangering scientific communication. We argue that the increasing number of publication retractions that have been witnessed over several years is a direct consequence of the bias created by the inconsistency of citation metrics.
Related Concept Videos
Bystander Effect
Impact: Problem Solving
By designating the launch point as the origin and utilizing kinematic equations, the vertical component of the projectile's velocity at the point of impact is...
Contemporary Psychology
Biopsychology
Biopsychology, also known as biological psychology or behavioral neuroscience, focuses on the biological underpinnings of behavior and mental processes. It...
Hindsight Biases
Types of Impact
The coefficient of restitution is a metric for understanding the dynamics of impacts. It quantifies the ratio of relative velocity...
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay
