Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
A Contemporary Assessment of Mechanical Complication Rates and Trainee Perceptions of Central Venous Catheter
Lauren Heidemann1,2, Niket Nathani3, Rommel Sagana3
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Background:
Limited data exist regarding rates of mechanical complications of ultrasound-guided, nontunneled central venous catheters (CVC). Similarly, trainee perceptions surrounding CVC complications are largely unknown.
Objectives:
To evaluate contemporary CVC mechanical complication rates, associated risk factors, and trainee perspectives.
Design:
A single-center retrospective review of CVC procedures between June 1, 2014, and May 1, 2015. Electronic survey distributed to internal medicine trainees.
Setting:
Intensive care units and the emergency department at an academic hospital.
Measurements:
Electronic health records of patients with CVC procedures were reviewed for complications. Demographic and procedural characteristics were compared for complicated vs uncomplicated procedures. Student t tests and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results:
Of the 730 reviewed records, 14 serious mechanical complications occurred due to pneumothorax (n = 5), bleeding (n = 3), vascular injury (n = 3), stroke (n = 1), and death (n = 2). Risk factors for complicated vs uncomplicated CVC placement included subclavian location (21.4% vs 7.8%, π = 0.001), number of attempts (2.2 vs 1.5, π = 0.02), unsuccessful CVC (21.4% vs. 4.3%, π = 0.001), attending supervision (61.5% vs 34.7%, π = 0.04), low body mass index (mean 25.7 kg/ mΒ² vs 31.5 kg/mΒ², π = 0.001), anticoagulation (28.6% vs 20.6%, π = 0.048), and ventilation (78.5% vs 66.5%, π = 0.001). Survey data suggested deficiencies in managing unsuccessful CVC procedures; specifically, only 35% (N = 21/60) of trainees regularly perform chest x-rays after failed CVC attempt.
Conclusions:
We observed a 1.9% rate of mechanical complications associated with CVC placement. Our study confirms historical data that unsuccessful CVC attempts are an important risk factor for complications. Education regarding unsuccessful CVC placement may improve patient safety.
More Related Videos
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
07:47The Supraclavicular Fossa Ultrasound View for Central Venous Catheter Placement and Catheter Change Over Guidewire
Published on: December 23, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management