Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bootstrapping

Bootstrapping

The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Prediction Intervals

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Commentary: Muddying the waters: Limitations of secondary subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials.

JTCVS structural and endovascular·2026

Same author

2025 Canadian Surgery Forum: Sept. 17-20, 2025.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2025

Same author

Home-Based Prehabilitation for Older Surgical Patients With Frailty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA surgery·2025

Same author

Description and validation of the Postoperative Discharge Recovery State outcome: a patient-partnered population-based cohort study.

British journal of anaesthesia·2025

Same author

External validation of a model using health administrative data to predict acetabular fracture probability: Brief report.

Medicine·2024

Same author

Home-based exercise prehabilitation to improve disease-free survival and return to intended oncologic treatment after cancer surgery in older adults with frailty: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 25, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Improved Correction of Misclassification Bias With Bootstrap Imputation.

Carl van Walraven¹

¹Department of Medicine and Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

|August 9, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) may yield invalid results, while bootstrap imputation (BI) effectively reduces misclassification bias in administrative database research when accurate disease probability estimates are used.

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 25, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics
Health Informatics

Background:

Administrative databases are crucial for health research but susceptible to misclassification bias from diagnostic codes.
Quantitative bias analysis (QBA) and bootstrap imputation (BI) are methods to correct this bias.
QBA requires sensitivity and specificity but can produce invalid results, while BI traditionally needs complex models.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the effectiveness of QBA and BI in correcting misclassification bias in administrative database research.
To evaluate the validity and bias reduction capabilities of both methods.

Main Methods:

Compared diagnostic codes with serum creatinine measures for severe renal failure in 100,000 patients.
Calculated prevalence and covariate associations using both methods.
Applied QBA and BI to correct for misclassification bias, varying BI's complexity.

Main Results:

Diagnostic codes exaggerated prevalence (median 16.6%) and covariate associations.
QBA produced invalid results in 9.3% of cases and increased bias.
BI successfully decreased misclassification bias, improving with more accurate disease probability estimates.

Conclusions:

QBA can lead to invalid results and exacerbate bias.
BI offers a robust alternative, avoiding invalid results and significantly reducing misclassification bias.
Accurate disease probability estimation is key for effective BI.