Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Prolonged immigration detention, complicity and boycotts
Melanie Jansen1,2, Alanna Sue Tin1, David Isaacs3,4
1Centre for Children's Health Ethics and Law, Children's Health Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract:
Australia's punitive policy towards people seeking asylum deliberately causes severe psychological harm and meets recognised definitions of torture. Consequently, there is a tension between doctors' obligation not to be complicit in torture and doctors' obligation to provide best possible care to their patients, including those seeking asylum. In this paper, we explore the nature of complicity and discuss the arguments for and against a proposed call for doctors to boycott working in immigration detention. We conclude that a degree of complicity is unavoidable when working in immigration detention, but that it may be ethically justifiable. We identify ways to minimise the harms associated with complicity and argue that it is ethical to continue working in immigration detention as long as due care and attention is paid to minimising the harms of complicity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Robbers Cave
Cognitive Dissonance
Bullying
In- and Out-Groups

