Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Outcomes of Succinylcholine and Rocuronium for Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department.

The western journal of emergency medicine·2026

Same author

Somatostatin Receptor 2 Negative Pheochromocytoma Masked by Normal Adrenal Gland on Gallium-68 DOTATATE.

AACE clinical case reports·2025

Same author

Time-of-Flight PET/CT Imaging of Ga-68-Dotatate: Normal Pattern, SUV Quantification, and Differences from Non-Time-of-Flight Imaging.

World journal of nuclear medicine·2024

Same author

Simulated Fewer-Angle SPECT/CT Imaging Protocol for Parathyroid Adenoma.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2023

Same author

Anxiety in parents of children with IgE-mediated food allergies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2023

Same author

2022 Update on Clinical Management of Graves Disease and Thyroid Eye Disease.

Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America·2022

Same journal

<sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT Versus <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for Baseline Mapping in Ollier Disease: A Pediatric Case.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026

Same journal

Incidental Detection of Aggressive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-Sestamibi Parathyroid Scintigraphy.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026

Same journal

Structured Educational Tours in Hospital-Based Radiopharmaceutical Production: Balancing Safety and Learning.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026

Same journal

Development of a Phantom for Evaluating Image Quality and Partial-Volume Effects in Hot and Cold Regions in Small-Animal SPECT and PET.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026

Same journal

Nonuniformity in a Certified <sup>68</sup>Ge PET Cylinder Phantom: Implications for Normalization Quality Assurance.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026

Same journal

Reducing Formation of Suspected Tracer Microemboli During Preparation of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-Tagged Heat-Damaged Red Blood Cells.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Technical Peer Review: Methods and Outcomes.

Andrew M Keenan¹, Toni Cranston², Kelsey Hill²

¹Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland andrew.m.keenan.civ@mail.mil.

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

|August 12, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Implementing technical peer review in nuclear medicine technology significantly improves patient care quality. This system tracks errors, provides feedback, and measurably reduces mistakes in nuclear medicine studies.

Keywords:

nuclear medicine technology peer review performance improvement

More Related Videos

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Author Spotlight: A Machine-Vision Approach to Transmission Electron Microscopy Workflows, Results Analysis and Data Management

Author Spotlight: A Machine-Vision Approach to Transmission Electron Microscopy Workflows, Results Analysis and Data Management

Published on: June 23, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Author Spotlight: A Machine-Vision Approach to Transmission Electron Microscopy Workflows, Results Analysis and Data Management

Author Spotlight: A Machine-Vision Approach to Transmission Electron Microscopy Workflows, Results Analysis and Data Management

Published on: June 23, 2023

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Radiologic Technology
Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

Peer review is standard in many healthcare professions but not widely adopted in nuclear medicine technology.
The absence of established methods for nuclear medicine technical peer review hinders quality enhancement.
Despite not being a regulatory requirement, peer review can improve patient care in nuclear medicine.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a detailed methodology for implementing technical peer review in nuclear medicine.
To demonstrate the effectiveness of a technical peer review system in reducing errors.
To offer an adaptable model for other nuclear medicine facilities.

Main Methods:

A 5-year review of 19,688 nuclear medicine studies at a single institution.
Identification and tabulation of major and minor technical findings.
Analysis of errors by type, study, and staff member.

Main Results:

The developed peer review system effectively measured error rates and types.
The system provided performance tracking for staff and students.
Consistent feedback led to a quantifiable decrease in errors over time.

Conclusions:

A practical technical peer review system for nuclear medicine was successfully implemented.
The system demonstrated a measurable reduction in errors and improved quality of care.
This adaptable peer review model can be adopted by other nuclear medicine facilities.