Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Tissue-Engineered Graft for Circumferential Esophageal Reconstruction in Rats
Published on: February 10, 2020
Oesophageal replacement with stomach: A personal series and review of published experience
Karim Awad1,2, Bruce Jaffray1
1Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Insights
Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children causes significant long-term health problems. Existing studies underestimate these complications due to insufficient follow-up periods.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Esophageal replacement using the stomach (gastric transposition) is a surgical procedure for children with esophageal defects.
- Long-term outcomes and complication rates in pediatric patients undergoing this procedure require thorough evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the outcomes of esophageal replacement using the stomach in children.
- To assess the incidence and nature of early and late complications following gastric transposition.
- To compare the study's findings with existing published literature on long-term follow-up.
Main Methods:
- Prospective data collection of all children undergoing esophageal replacement with stomach in a regional center.
- Classification of complications into early (within 30 days) and late categories.
- Comprehensive analysis of published literature, classifying studies by follow-up duration (median >5 years for long-term).
Main Results:
- Ten children underwent gastric transposition between 1998 and 2016 for various indications.
- All ten patients experienced complications; survivors faced significant early and late morbidities, including anastomotic leaks, strictures, anemia, and esophagitis.
- Published literature often underestimates complication rates due to incomplete or short follow-up periods.
Conclusions:
- Esophageal replacement by gastric transposition in children results in substantial and serious chronic morbidity.
- The true incidence of complications is likely masked in published data due to inadequate long-term follow-up.
- This highlights the need for extended follow-up in evaluating surgical outcomes for pediatric esophageal reconstruction.
Aim:
To describe the outcomes of oesophageal replacement using stomach in children.
Methods:
All children undergoing oesophageal replacement in a regional centre were prospectively recorded in a customised database and subjected to continual follow up. Complications within 30 days were classified as early, and all other complications were classified as late. Outcomes were related to a comprehensive analysis of published experience where studies were classified as having long-term follow up if the median duration exceeded 5 years.
Results:
Ten children underwent oesophageal replacement using the stomach between 1998 and 2016. Indications were oesophageal atresia (6), caustic ingestion (2), foreign body ingestion (1) and oesophageal hamartoma (1). Two children died at 2 and 7 months after gastric transposition. All survivors are under review, with a median follow up of 8.5 years (range 3-14 years). Complications occurred in every case. Among survivors, three had early complications and eight had late complications. Early complications included anastomotic leak (2) and lung compression by stomach (1). Late complications were anaemia (8), anastomotic stricture (7), oesophagitis (5), dumping syndrome (2), perforation of a jejunostomy (1), para-gastric hiatal hernia (1), gastric outlet obstruction (1), Barrett's oesophagus (1), prolonged inability to swallow (1) and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections (1). Among 57 publications, only three achieved complete long-term follow up. The incidence of reported complications was higher when follow up was complete.
Conclusions:
Oesophageal replacement by gastric transposition in children leads to serious chronic morbidity. Published experience masks this because of incomplete and short follow up.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...

