Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

The Measurement of Unsteady Surface Pressure Using a Remote Microphone Probe
Published on: December 3, 2016
A time-domain model and experimental validation of the acoustic field radiated by air-coupled transducers
1Ecole Centrale de Lille, IEMN, 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France.
Abstract:
This paper presents a time-domain model for the prediction of an acoustic field in an air-coupled, non-contact, ultrasonic setup, which includes an air-coupled Emitter, the Propagation space and an air-coupled Receiver (EPR). The model takes into account the finite size of the aperture receiver, attenuation in air, and the electric response of the emitter-receiver set he. The attenuation is characterized by a causal time-domain Green's function, allowing the wideband attenuation of a lossy medium obeying the power law α(ω)=α0ωη,1⩽η⩽2 to be included. The electrical response is recovered experimentally using a procedure which includes the deconvolution of air absorption effects. The model is implemented numerically using a discrete representation approach. In order to study the influence of receiver size and attenuation, five different computational approaches are proposed; each of these is evaluated quantitatively, by comparing the predicted acoustic field with the experimentally measured signal. The prediction error is studied in both the near and far fields, for three typical field features: the system's impulse response, the on-axis field distribution, and the directivity pattern, for the case of air-coupled transducers operating at two different central frequencies, namely 50kHz and 350kHz, with a 10mm diameter wideband receiver. It is shown that when the attenuation in air, the receiver size, and the accurately recovered electric response he, are correctly taken into account, the model allows the system's impulse response to be accurately predicted, with on-axis errors ranging between 0.2% in the far field and 1% in the near field. In the near-field area and within the far field -3dB beam spread width, the error is generally greater than on the axis, but globally remains smaller than 1%. Inclusion of the size of the receiver dimension in the model appears to be crucial to the accuracy of the near field predictions, and an approximate criterion is proposed for the evaluation of the influence of receiver. The procedure used to recover the electric response he is also presented in detail. The results obtained from this study are used to formulate various recommendations related to EPR modelling.
Related Concept Videos
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Properties of Fourier Transform I
In radio broadcasting, multiple audio signals often need to be transmitted simultaneously. The Fourier...
Generating Electromagnetic Radiations
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...

