Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Habitual exercise prior to intracerebral hemorrhage primes brain environment against injury in a dose-dependent manner of the exercise.

Biomedical research (Tokyo, Japan)·2026
Same author

Development of kinematic characteristics during jumping-rope movement in Japanese children aged 7-14 years.

Gait & posture·2026
Same author

Guidewire Traction Retrieval of a Dislodged Classic Crown During Coronary Orbital Atherectomy.

The American journal of case reports·2026
Same author

Pretreatment with a histone deacetylase inhibitor, sodium butyrate, potentiates the sustained expression of myelin-associated and neurotrophic genes in cultured Schwann cells.

Neuroreport·2026
Same author

Inter-rater reliability of the instrumented lean-and-release (iLEAN) test for manual assessment of reactive balance: a pilot study in simulated older adults.

Journal of physical therapy science·2026
Same author

Genetic features of Japanese children with ABCA3 deficiency.

Early human development·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training
09:13

A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training

Published on: January 20, 2019

6.9K

Learning effects of dynamic postural control by auditory biofeedback versus visual biofeedback training.

Naoya Hasegawa1, Kenta Takeda2, Moe Sakuma2

  • 1Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0812, Japan; Sapporo Yamanoue Hospital, Yamanote 6-9, Nishi-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 063-0006, Japan.

Gait & Posture
|August 12, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Auditory biofeedback (BF) enhances motor learning for dynamic postural control more effectively than visual BF. This suggests auditory cues improve proprioceptive integration, leading to better stability without feedback.

Keywords:
Auditory biofeedbackBody swayCenter of pressurePostural controlVisual biofeedback

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

10.2K
Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
14:52

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication

Published on: December 11, 2013

12.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training
09:13

A Vibrotactile Feedback Device for Seated Balance Assessment and Training

Published on: January 20, 2019

6.9K
Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
08:12

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control

Published on: September 11, 2019

10.2K
Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
14:52

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication

Published on: December 11, 2013

12.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Motor Control
  • Sensory Neuroscience

Background:

  • Augmented sensory biofeedback (BF) is used to improve postural stability.
  • The optimal sensory modality for motor learning in postural control BF remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the motor learning effects of visual versus auditory BF in dynamic postural control.
  • To compare the efficacy of different sensory feedback types for improving postural stability.

Main Methods:

  • Eighteen healthy adults were divided into visual BF and auditory BF groups.
  • Participants controlled center of pressure (COP) to match a moving target.
  • Perceptual magnitudes of visual and auditory feedback were equalized using Stevens' power law.

Main Results:

  • The auditory BF group showed reduced spatial and temporal postural errors in a retention test without feedback.
  • The visual BF group did not show significant improvements in the no-feedback retention test.
  • Auditory BF enhanced motor learning of dynamic postural control without feedback.

Conclusions:

  • Visual BF may increase reliance on visual information, potentially hindering motor learning.
  • Auditory BF appears to improve proprioceptive system integration, facilitating motor learning.
  • Auditory biofeedback is a promising tool for enhancing dynamic postural control and motor learning.