Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Cefoperazone-treated Mouse Model of Clinically-relevant Clostridium difficile Strain R20291
Published on: December 10, 2016
Comparative pathogenomics of Clostridium tetani
Jonathan E Cohen1, Rong Wang2, Rong-Fong Shen2
1Laboratory of Respiratory and Special Pathogens, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Genomic analysis of Clostridium tetani reveals distinct genetic differences between vaccine and wild-type strains. This study enhances understanding of tetanus neurotoxin-producing bacteria and their evolutionary relationships.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Genomics
- Bacterial Pathogenesis
Background:
- Clostridium tetani and Clostridium botulinum produce potent neurotoxins.
- Research on C. tetani genetics is less extensive than for C. botulinum due to perceived lower genetic diversity and reduced public health threat from tetanus.
- Genomic data on the U.S. vaccine strain of C. tetani is needed to understand its genetic relationship to European vaccine strains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To acquire genomic data on the U.S. vaccine strain of C. tetani.
- To compare genomic data of U.S. vaccine strains with European vaccine and wild-type strains.
- To investigate the genetic relationship and mobile genome diversity within C. tetani.
Main Methods:
- High-throughput genomic sequencing of two wild-type and two vaccine C. tetani strains.
- Comparative genomic analysis including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
- Analysis of mobile genome elements: flagellar glycosylation island, bacteriophage insertion regions, CRISPR-Cas systems, and plasmids.
Main Results:
- Vaccine strains formed a distinct clade compared to wild-type strains based on mobile element variations.
- CRISPR-Cas systems (Type IA, IB, IIIA) were analyzed, with intact Type IA and IB systems found in most strains.
- Phage infection histories inferred from CRISPR-Cas sequences suggest C. tetani interacts with common environmental phages.
Conclusions:
- Genomic variations in mobile elements differentiate vaccine and wild-type C. tetani strains.
- Phylogenetic histories from SNPs, mobile elements, and CRISPR-Cas systems suggest a common ancestor for vaccine and wild-type strains.
- The findings provide insights into the genetic diversity and evolution of C. tetani, particularly concerning vaccine strains.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

