Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

General Anesthesia: Overview

General Anesthesia: Overview

Anesthesia is a medical procedure that uses drugs for CNS suppression to enable painless surgeries and procedures. The selection of anesthetics is influenced by their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and patient characteristics. Various types of anesthesia include general, local, regional, spinal, and inhalational.
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Deferring tracheal extubation to the postanesthesia care unit.

Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie·2026

Same author

Effect of PEEP titration on the incidence of elevated driving pressure in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a randomized superiority trial.

BMC anesthesiology·2026

Same author

Continuous erector spinae plane block for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery in lung cancer: a dual-center retrospective propensity-score weighted cohort study.

Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)·2026

Same author

Association between complications and mortality after cardiac surgery: Results from the Vascular Events in Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation cardiac surgery prospective cohort study.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026

Same author

Effects of taurine supplementation on metabolic health and biological aging in healthcare workers: A protocol for a triple-blinded, Bayesian-optimized phase II randomized controlled trial.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Systemic Heparinization After Neuraxial Anesthesia in Vascular Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

Inattentional blindness in anesthesiology: A simulation study.

Anthony M-H Ho¹, Joseph Y C Leung², Glenio B Mizubuti¹

¹Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

|August 13, 2017

Summary

Medical students noticed unexpected surgical events more often than experienced anesthesiologists, suggesting inattentional blindness affects expert perception. This highlights a potential gap in vigilance during complex procedures.

Keywords:

Inattentional blindness Simulation Situation awareness

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

Area of Science:

Anesthesiology
Medical Education
Cognitive Psychology

Background:

Inattentional blindness describes the failure to perceive unexpected stimuli.
Anesthesiologists' expertise may paradoxically increase their susceptibility to overlooking critical intraoperative events.
Medical students, with less specialized experience, might possess heightened awareness of novel occurrences.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the phenomenon of inattentional blindness in anesthesiologists compared to medical students.
To determine if experience influences the ability to detect unexpected intraoperative events during simulated surgery.

Main Methods:

A simulation study utilized a video depicting a simulated septic patient during abdominal surgery.
Participants included 31 certified anesthesiologists and 46 upper-year medical students.
Subjects observed the surgical video and identified abnormalities, including physiological changes and unexpected events like head movement and a leaky central line.

Main Results:

Medical students demonstrated a significantly higher rate of detecting unexpected head movement compared to anesthesiologists (p<0.001).
The study identified a notable difference in vigilance between the two groups regarding unexpected visual cues.

Conclusions:

Experienced anesthesiologists may be more prone to inattentional blindness for unexpected events than less experienced medical students.
This finding has implications for training and vigilance strategies in the operating room to mitigate risks associated with overlooking critical incidents.