Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
How do NIHR peer review panels use bibliometric information to support their decisions?
Salil Gunashekar1, Steven Wooding2, Susan Guthrie1
1RAND Europe, Cambridge, CB4 1YG UK.
Research funding panels broadly support bibliometrics, finding normalized citation scores most useful for initial candidate assessments. Improved understanding of bibliometric techniques is key to addressing cross-field comparability concerns.
Area of Science:
- Research Evaluation
- Bibliometrics
- Science Policy
Background:
- Bibliometrics is a common tool for evaluating research and development (R&D).
- The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) in the UK uses bibliometric analysis in funding decisions.
- Understanding the practical application of bibliometrics in R&D funding is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how bibliometric information influences decision-making in research funding panels.
- To identify which bibliometric measures are most and least useful to panel members.
- To uncover challenges faced by panel members when using bibliometric data.
Main Methods:
- Interviews with ten panel members from three NIHR panels.
- Analysis of information provided to the award selection panels.
- Qualitative assessment of bibliometric data usage in R&D decision-making.
Main Results:
- Panel members generally support the use of bibliometrics in R&D evaluations.
- Bibliometric data are primarily utilized during the initial individual assessment of candidates.
- Normalized citation scores and proportion of highly cited papers are considered most useful measures.
Conclusions:
- Bibliometrics are broadly accepted and useful in R&D funding evaluations, particularly in initial assessments.
- Concerns about cross-field comparability stem from a lack of understanding, highlighting the need for effective background information.
- Guidance on providing bibliometric data to research funding panels is proposed based on observed panel behavior and concerns.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Biostatistics: Overview
Discrete variables are...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

