Policy implementation for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in seven European countries: a comparative

Takuya Kinoshita1, Hironobu Tokumasu1, Shiro Tanaka1

  • 1Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Insights

Implementing mandatory surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) may help reduce healthcare-associated (HA-MRSA) and livestock-associated (LA-MRSA) infections in Europe. This policy showed a decrease in MRSA rates across several countries.

Area of Science:

  • * Infectious Disease Epidemiology
  • * Public Health Policy
  • * Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance

Background:

  • * Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a significant threat in both healthcare and livestock settings.
  • * Europe-wide policies aim to reduce MRSA, but evaluation is challenging for non-implementing nations.
  • * This study examines MRSA rates, policy implementation, and antibiotic use across seven European countries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To describe multinational MRSA rates and policy implementation, focusing on mandatory surveillance.
  • * To investigate the impact of MRSA surveillance policies on infection rates.
  • * To explore correlations between antibiotic consumption (human and veterinary) and MRSA rates.

Main Methods:

  • * Utilized Europe-wide data from EARS-Net, ESAC-Net, and ESVAC (1999-2015).
  • * Visualized MRSA policies and rates, comparing countries with and without mandatory surveillance.
  • * Analyzed correlations between antibiotic use (defined daily doses and sales data) and MRSA rates.

Main Results:

  • * MRSA rates varied widely (1-45.4%) across the seven countries between 1999 and 2015.
  • * Mandatory surveillance policies were associated with MRSA rate decreases (0.61 to 0.24) within 6-12 years.
  • * Positive correlations were found between MRSA rates and cephalosporin (r=0.419) and fluoroquinolone (r=0.305) consumption; veterinary antibiotic use varied significantly by country.

Conclusions:

  • * European countries exhibit diverse policy implications for LA- and HA-MRSA.
  • * Mandatory surveillance appears beneficial for countries yet to implement MRSA policies, though causation requires further study.
  • * Continued investigation is necessary to fully evaluate the effectiveness of various MRSA control policies.