Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Community Based Intervention

Community Based Intervention

Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...

Nursing Implementation

Nursing Implementation

Implementation is the execution of the nursing care plan developed during the planning phase.
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Community perspectives on the return of research results and ownership of data and specimens for brain tumor genomic research.

SSM. Qualitative research in health·2026

Same author

Health equity-oriented design for dissemination: products and impact of rapid community translation for COVID-19 vaccine promotion.

Frontiers in public health·2026

Same author

Does a protocolised oxygenation target impact clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit across the 10 academic and community hospitals in the UCHealth system? Protocol and statistical analysis plan for an EHR-embedded pragmatic stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Engaging Community to Identify Patient-Centered Lethal Means Safety Outcomes for Youth.

Pediatrics·2026

Same author

Opioid Overdose Risk Perceptions and Barriers and Facilitators to Naloxone Distribution for Hospitalized Patients Who Use Stimulants: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Clinicians.

Journal of addiction medicine·2026

Same author

Implementation of an ultrasound-guided nerve block program in an academic emergency department.

Frontiers in public health·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Mixed methods evaluation of a collaborative care implementation using RE-AIM.

Bethany M Kwan¹, Sanjay Chadha², Mika K Hamer³

¹Department of Family Medicine, Adult & Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research & Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine.

Families, Systems & Health : the Journal of Collaborative Family Healthcare

|August 15, 2017

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluated collaborative care implementation in primary care using the RE-AIM framework. While many patients accepted services, participation varied, yet all found the integrated behavioral health care valuable.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

Area of Science:

Implementation Science
Primary Care
Behavioral Health Integration

Background:

Collaborative care models are increasingly implemented in primary care settings.
Evaluating these implementations is crucial for understanding real-world effectiveness and dissemination.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the implementation of a collaborative care model in two primary care practices.
To assess the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) of these services.

Main Methods:

Mixed methods approach utilizing the RE-AIM framework.
Screening for depression, anxiety, and alcohol use in adult primary care patients.
On-site behavioral health care managers (BHCMs) provided integrated care with clinician collaboration.

Main Results:

Nearly 40% of patients screened positive for behavioral health concerns.
Of those referred, 86% accepted and 54% participated in integrated services.
Patients reported services were valuable and built coping skills, regardless of participation.

Conclusions:

The RE-AIM framework provides a systematic method for evaluating collaborative care programs.
Findings can inform program improvements and contribute to the literature on integrated care implementation.
Successful implementation requires understanding patient engagement and perceived value.