Refractory Intracranial Hypertension: The Role of Decompressive Craniectomy

Martin Smith1,2

  • 1From the Neurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.

Anesthesia and Analgesia
|August 15, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Decompressive craniectomy lowers mortality for traumatic brain injury and stroke but increases severe disability. Patient preferences and quality of life are crucial for this intervention.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Neurology
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is linked to poor outcomes in acute brain injury.
  • Clinical guidelines recommend prompt management of intracranial hypertension.
  • ICP-lowering therapies escalate from safer first-line options to higher-risk interventions for refractory cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the management of intractable intracranial hypertension in adults.
  • To focus on the role of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and acute ischemic stroke.
  • To analyze the benefits and risks of decompressive craniectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Narrative review of existing literature.
  • Analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for decompressive craniectomy in TBI and stroke.
  • Discussion of clinical indications and patient-specific factors.

Main Results:

  • Decompressive craniectomy reduces mortality after TBI but increases severe disability.
  • Hemicraniectomy improves mortality and functional outcomes in younger adults (<60) with malignant hemispheric infarction.
  • In older adults (>60) with stroke, surgery reduces mortality but leads to more severe disability compared to medical management.

Conclusions:

  • Decompressive craniectomy is a critical intervention for intractable intracranial hypertension in TBI and stroke.
  • The decision to perform decompressive craniectomy requires careful consideration of clinical evidence, patient preferences, and quality of life expectations.
  • While beneficial for mortality, the procedure's impact on long-term disability necessitates individualized treatment planning.