Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

11:13
Assessment of Viability of Human Fat Injection into Nude Mice with Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: January 7, 2015
11.7K
Optimization and Standardization of the Immunodeficient Mouse Model for Assessing Fat Grafting Outcomes
Lauren E Kokai1,2, Taraneh L Jones1,2, Russell Silowash1,2
1Pittsburgh, Pa.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|August 15, 2017
Summary
The immunocompromised mouse model can predict fat grafting outcomes, but only for small, 0.3-ml grafts. Larger grafts showed confounding results due to unresorbed oil cysts and potential delayed immune reactions.
Area of Science:
- Regenerative Medicine
- Tissue Engineering
- Plastic Surgery
Background:
- Variability in animal models hinders standardization of fat grafting research.
- Immunocompromised mouse models are frequently used but their predictive value requires assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the immunocompromised mouse model for fat grafting outcomes.
- To standardize and optimize fat grafting experiments using reliable animal models.
Main Methods:
- Human lipoaspirate was injected into nude mice at various volumes and time points.
- Volume retention and histological scores were compared between viable and nonviable fat grafts.
- Interanimal reproducibility was assessed using a consistent hydrogel implant.
Main Results:
- Graft volume significantly impacted adipose resorption at 6 and 12 weeks.
- Large (1 ml) grafts developed unresorbed oil cysts, confounding volume retention data.
- Histological viability of 0.3 ml grafts correlated well with retention; interanimal variability was 8.44%.
Conclusions:
- Small (0.3 ml) fat grafts in immunocompromised mice show correlation between viability and retention.
- Large grafts (1.0 ml) yielded confounded volume measurements due to unresorbed oil cysts.
- Delayed immune reactions may affect fat graft outcomes in this model at 18 weeks.

