Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

05:43
Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
Published on: November 30, 2022
3.1K
Cognitive Cost of Using Augmented Reality Displays.
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
|August 16, 2017
Summary
Spatial augmented reality improved task performance and reduced cognitive load compared to head-mounted displays. Limited field of view in augmented reality systems increases cognitive load requirements for users.
Area of Science:
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Cognitive Psychology
- Augmented Reality Technology
Background:
- Augmented reality (AR) systems offer immersive experiences but can impose cognitive burdens.
- Understanding the cognitive load associated with different AR display technologies is crucial for effective design.
- Head-mounted displays (HMDs) present unique challenges related to field of view and user interaction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cognitive load imposed by three distinct augmented reality display technologies: spatial augmented reality (SAR), optical see-through (OST) Microsoft HoloLens, and video see-through (VST) Samsung Gear VR.
- To investigate the specific cognitive load associated with receiving instructions for a procedural task within these AR environments.
- To evaluate the impact of display technology and field of view limitations on user performance and cognitive effort.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted using a button-pressing procedural task.
- Cognitive load was assessed using both self-assessment and dual-task methodologies.
- Performance metrics and subjective cognitive load ratings were collected for each AR display condition.
Main Results:
- Spatial augmented reality (SAR) resulted in significantly higher task performance and lower cognitive load compared to both HoloLens and Gear VR.
- A limited field of view, characteristic of some HMDs, was found to directly correlate with increased cognitive load.
- Users experienced greater cognitive burden when interacting with optical see-through and video see-through HMDs.
Conclusions:
- Spatial augmented reality (SAR) appears to be a more cognitively efficient display technology for instructional tasks than current head-mounted displays.
- Design limitations of head-mounted displays, particularly restricted field of view, contribute to increased user cognitive load.
- Future AR system development should prioritize wider fields of view and explore SAR principles to minimize cognitive burden and enhance user performance.

