Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Content and Construct Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Questionnaire:
Susan J Bartlett1,2, Skye P Barbic3,4, Vivian P Bykerk3,4
1From McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; University of California, Los Angeles; Healthy Motivation, Santa Barbara, California, USA; Cardiff University, Cardiff; University of the West of England, Bristol, UK; Schlosspark-Klinik University Medicine, Berlin, Germany; Parker Institute, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark; Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmege; Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris; University of Lorraine, Lorraine, France; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. susan.bartlett@mcgill.ca.
Objective:
The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Flare Group was established to develop a reliable way to identify and measure RA flares in randomized controlled trials (RCT). Here, we summarized the development and field testing of the RA Flare Questionnaire (RA-FQ), and the voting results at OMERACT 2016.
Methods:
Classic and modern psychometric methods were used to assess reliability, validity, sensitivity, factor structure, scoring, and thresholds. Interviews with patients and clinicians also assessed content validity, utility, and meaningfulness of RA-FQ scores.
Results:
People with RA in observational trials in Canada (n = 896) and France (n = 138), and an RCT in the Netherlands (n = 178) completed 5 items (11-point numerical rating scale) representing RA Flare core domains. There was moderate to high evidence of reliability, content and construct validity, and responsiveness. Factor analysis supported unidimensionality. Rasch analysis showed acceptable fit to the Rasch model, with items and people covering a broad measurement continuum and evidence of appropriate targeting of items to people, ordered thresholds, minimal differential item functioning by language, sex, or age. A summative score across items is defensible, yielding an interval score (0-50) where higher scores reflect worsening flare. The RA-FQ received endorsement from 88% of attendees that it passed the OMERACT Filter 2.0 "Eyeball Test" for instrument selection.
Conclusion:
The RA-FQ has been developed to identify and measure RA flares. Its review through OMERACT Filter 2.0 shows evidence of reliability, content and construct validity, and responsiveness. These properties merit its further validation as an outcome for clinical trials.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History

