Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Camera augmentation: enabling uncalibrated stereo matching of minimally invasive surgery images by training from the wealth of public synthetic image datasets.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026
Same author

Tumour-focused 3D-2D registration in liver laparoscopy.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026
Same author

Do MRI radiomic models truly generalize? External validation of three studies in parotid lesion characterization.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Hidden Tumour Visualization in Augmented Monocular Liver Laparoscopy.

Healthcare technology letters·2026
Same author

Author's reply.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2026
Same author

Point-Guided Latent Diffusion Model for Novel View Synthesis in Laparoscopic Liver Surgery.

Healthcare technology letters·2025
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
10:25

Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation

Published on: September 2, 2025

569

Augmented reality in a tumor resection model.

Pauline Chauvet1,2, Toby Collins2, Clement Debize2

  • 1Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Estaing, place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Surgical Endoscopy
|August 17, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Augmented Reality (AR) guidance improves surgical tumor resection accuracy, especially for small tumors. This technology reduces positive margins and complete misses compared to traditional methods.

Keywords:
Augmented realityLaparoscopic surgeryPartial nephrectomyResection margins

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
07:46

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K
Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone
09:26

Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone

Published on: January 2, 2020

19.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
10:25

Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation

Published on: September 2, 2025

569
Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
07:46

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.2K
Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone
09:26

Combining Augmented Reality and 3D Printing to Display Patient Models on a Smartphone

Published on: January 2, 2020

19.1K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Surgical Technology
  • Computer-Assisted Surgery

Background:

  • Augmented Reality (AR) guidance overlays pre-operative imaging onto live laparoscopic video.
  • This technology enables surgeons to visualize sub-surface structures during surgery.
  • The study evaluates a state-of-the-art AR system for tumor resection accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of surgical tumor resection using an AR guidance system.
  • To compare the effectiveness of AR-assisted resection versus conventional laparoscopic resection.
  • To evaluate the impact of AR on identifying and removing small tumors and ensuring clear margins.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective experimental study was conducted on ex vivo porcine kidneys with injected alginate pseudotumors.
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was used to create 3D models of kidneys and tumors.
  • The AR system registered pre-operative and intra-operative models, augmenting the laparoscopic view; resection margins were microscopically analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Sixty-two tumors were resected: 29 with AR and 33 without.
  • The AR group showed a lower rate of positive margins (13.8%) compared to the Non-AR group (30.3%).
  • Complete tumor misses occurred in 0% of AR resections versus 12.1% in the Non-AR group.

Conclusions:

  • The AR guidance system significantly enhances surgical resection accuracy, particularly for small tumors.
  • AR visualization aids in identifying tumors and critical structures like vascularization.
  • The technology demonstrated a reduction in positive margins and complete tumor misses, improving surgical outcomes.