Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Adjusting diet-outcome associations for random error: comparison of associations based on observed and estimated
E Verly1, R Sichieri1, V T Baltar2
1Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Background/Objectives:
To compare linear regression coefficients adjusted for random errors with true coefficients.
Subjects/Methods:
Three hundred and two individuals from the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil answered 20 non-consecutive 24-hr. Means of 20 24-hr were used as an approximation of the usual dietary intakes. It was simulated outcomes with pre-defined linear regression coefficient (β=1.0, referred as 'true coefficient') for usual coffee and soft-drink intakes as explanatory variables controlled for sex and age. Regression calibration was applied in each 1000 random combinations of j days of intake (j=2, 4 and 6), and adjusted coefficients were compared with true one.
Results:
Mean-adjusted coefficients were 1.06 to 1.03 (coffee) and 1.17 to 1.11 (soft drink). The association was not detected (95% CI included zero) in 33 to 23% (coffee) and 37 to 23% (soft drink) when using two and six collection days, respectively, compared with 20% when using observed usual intake. Frequency of consumption as covariate in the regression calibration model increased the precision of the adjusted coefficients.
Conclusions:
Adjustment for random errors de-attenuates the association but its precision depends mainly on the number of collection days and sample size.
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Regression Toward the Mean
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Random and Systematic Errors
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Odds Ratio

