A comparative study of different methods for automatic identification of clopidogrel-induced bleedings in electronic

Hee-Jin Lee1, Min Jiang1, Yonghui Wu1

  • 1University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.

Insights

Automated methods can effectively identify adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from electronic health records (EHRs). Scoring and machine learning approaches show promise for pharmacogenomic research, improving patient safety and drug discovery.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Pharmacogenomics
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Electronic health records (EHRs) linked with biobanks are crucial for pharmacogenomic studies.
  • Identifying patients with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from large EHR datasets is challenging.
  • Manual chart review for ADR identification is time-consuming and expensive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and compare informatics approaches for automatic ADR identification from EHRs.
  • To utilize clopidogrel-induced bleeding as a case study for ADR detection.
  • To advance EHR-based pharmacogenomic research through efficient ADR identification.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated three methods: rule-based, machine learning-based, and scoring function-based.
  • Applied these methods to identify clopidogrel-induced bleeding events in EHRs.
  • Analyzed feature contributions, including temporality and physician assertions.

Main Results:

  • Both machine learning and scoring methods demonstrated effectiveness in identifying ADRs.
  • The scoring method achieved high precision with reasonable recall.
  • Temporality of drug-event and textual evidence from physicians significantly aided identification.

Conclusions:

  • Automated informatics approaches are valuable for identifying ADRs in EHRs.
  • Scoring and machine learning methods offer efficient alternatives to manual review.
  • Findings support the advancement of EHR-based pharmacogenomic studies and patient safety.

Related Concept Videos