Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Modified Octopus Technique for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: August 1, 2025
Total endovascular treatment for extent type 1 and 5 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms
Gabriele Piffaretti1, Federico Fontana2, Marco Franchin1
1Vascular Surgery, Department Medicine and Surgery, Circolo University Teaching Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy.
Insights
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms involving celiac artery coverage shows good survival and low reintervention rates. However, spinal cord ischemia remains a concern, necessitating careful patient selection.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Endovascular Repair
- Aortic Aneurysm Treatment
Background:
- Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) present complex treatment challenges.
- Open repair of TAAAs carries significant morbidity and mortality.
- Endovascular techniques offer an alternative, but landing zone limitations exist.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with intentional celiac artery coverage.
- To assess TEVAR for extent type 1 and type 5 TAAAs using a distal supramesenteric landing zone.
- To determine survival, aortic-related mortality, and reintervention rates after this approach.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients undergoing TEVAR for extent 1 or 5 TAAAs with celiac artery coverage.
- Inclusion of elective or urgent cases.
- Primary endpoints included in-hospital and follow-up survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality, and freedom from reintervention.
Main Results:
- 100% technical success with no early mortality or visceral ischemia.
- A 6% rate of permanent spinal cord ischemia was observed.
- Midterm follow-up showed satisfactory survival (85% at 1 year, 49% at 5 years) and freedom from reintervention (93% at 1 and 5 years).
- No type 1 endoleaks or distal stent-graft migration causing superior mesenteric artery occlusion were detected.
Conclusions:
- TEVAR with intentional celiac artery coverage is a viable option for selected high-risk patients with extent 1 and 5 TAAAs.
- While visceral ischemia was avoided, spinal cord ischemia remains a significant risk.
- Midterm outcomes demonstrate acceptable survival and reintervention rates, comparable to open repair.
Objective:
The study objective was to describe the results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the intentional coverage of the celiac artery and distal supramesenteric landing zone for extent type 1 and type 5 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
Methods:
Inclusion criteria were thoracic endovascular aortic repair with celiac artery coverage to treat elective or urgent extent type 1 and 5 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Primary end points were in-hospital and follow-up survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality, and freedom from reintervention.
Results:
Thoracoabdominal disease extent was type 1 in 12 patients (71%) and type 5 in 5 patients (29%). Urgent repair was performed in 4 patients (23.5%). Primary technical success was 100%. Early mortality and visceral ischemia did not occur. Permanent spinal cord ischemia rate was 6% (n = 1). Follow-up ranged from 3 to 120 months (interquartile range, 12-36.5). Survival estimate was 85% ± 9% (95% confidence interval, 67-94) at 1 year and 49% ± 17% (95% confidence interval, 21-78) at 5 years. Cumulative freedom from aortic-related mortality was 94%, and estimated freedom from reintervention at 1 and 5 years was 93% ± 7% (95% confidence interval, 68-99). Neither type 1 endoleaks nor distal stent-graft migration causing superior mesenteric artery occlusion was detected.
Conclusions:
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with intentional coverage of celiac artery for extent 1 and 5 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms had satisfactory results in selected patients at high risk for open repair. Visceral ischemia did not occur, but spinal cord ischemia is still high at 6%. At midterm follow-up, neither endoleak development nor aortic reintervention was related to the inadequate distal landing zone. Follow-up survival is satisfactory and comparable to open repair.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

