Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
Multicenter Trial of the VenaTech Convertible Vena Cava Filter.
Eric J Hohenwalter1, James R Stone2, Paul V O'Moore3
1Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Room 2803, Milwaukee, WI 53226.
The VenaTech Convertible filter shows a high success rate for conversion and a low rate of adverse events within six months. This investigational device demonstrates promising results for patients needing caval filters.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filters are used to prevent pulmonary embolism in high-risk patients.
- Filter conversion is a strategy to remove or modify IVC filters once the risk of pulmonary embolism has subsided.
- Assessing the safety and efficacy of convertible IVC filters is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the technical success rate of converting the VenaTech Convertible Vena Cava Filter.
- To determine the incidence of major device-related adverse events at 6 months post-conversion.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of the VenaTech Convertible filter in a real-world clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, prospective, single-arm study enrolled 149 patients requiring IVC filter implantation.
- The VenaTech Convertible filter was implanted in patients with venous thromboembolism, high-risk trauma, or for surgical prophylaxis.
- Filter conversion attempts were made when patients were no longer at risk for pulmonary embolism, with follow-up at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months.
Main Results:
- All IVC filter implants were technically successful.
- The technical success rate for filter conversion was 92.7% (89/96).
- No major conversion-related adverse events were reported within 6 months; 89 converted and 32 unconverted patients completed follow-up without delayed complications.
Conclusions:
- The VenaTech Convertible filter demonstrates a high conversion rate and a low rate of 6-month device-related adverse events.
- The device appears safe and effective for caval filter conversion in the short term.
- Further long-term studies are warranted to fully establish the safety and efficacy profile of this convertible filter.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications

